Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Yampa vs reflex, the Slant community recommends reflex for most people. In the question“What are the best Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) libraries for Haskell?” reflex is ranked 1st while Yampa is ranked 5th.
Specs
Supported notationArrow (proc)
Time modelContinuous
Supported notationMonad (do)
Time modelOrdered
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
No pros yet!
Pro It supports fully dynamic data flow using higher-order primitives
Pro It has a fairly direct implementation compared to many of the rest.
Pro Fully deterministic
Pro Supports both Continuous and Discrete time models
Reflex requires that time be ordered and linear. Within that constraint, it can be specialized to real timestamps or stepped sequences as needed.
Cons
Con Legacy code overlaps with other libraries
Yampa is an older package and portions were written before current de facto libraries, resulting in some duplication and potential idiosyncrasies.
No cons yet!