When comparing Verisign vs Modshield SB WAF, the Slant community recommends Modshield SB WAF for most people. In the question“What are the best services to protect against DDoS attacks for startups?” Modshield SB WAF is ranked 4th while Verisign is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose Modshield SB WAF is:
Despite its robust protection, the WAF doesn’t compromise on application performance.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Thorough and customized set up process
Verisign uses a very thorough set up process that can take weeks. This allows them to customize the payees service to their site/s in order to provide the best protection possible.
Pro Signature analysis, dynamic profiling and filtering of the OSI stack are used to detect DDoS attacks
Verisign uses a multitude of tools simultaneously to detect security breaches and DDoS attacks. By using signature analysis and dynamic profiling along with filtering of the OSI stack (in order to detect DDoS attacks that are not coming from the network layer) Verisign can easily detect attacks to then alert the user as well as start mitigating the attack.
Pro High Performance
Despite its robust protection, the WAF doesn’t compromise on application performance.
Pro Real-Time Threat Detection
The product operates in real-time, countering threats as they occur to ensure uninterrupted operation.
Pro Comprehensive Protection
Modshield SB WAF defends against SQL Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and many more threats, ensuring broad-spectrum security.
Cons
Con No 24/7 live chat
Verisign does not offer 24/7 live chat for customer service, only 24/7 telephone and e-mail support.
Con Technical Complexity
Some users might find the learning curve challenging due to the product's technicalities.