Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing GitHub Pull Requests vs Codifferous, the Slant community recommends GitHub Pull Requests for most people. In the question“What are the best peer code review tools for small development teams?” GitHub Pull Requests is ranked 1st while Codifferous is ranked 10th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Already integrated with GitHub projects
Pro Can reference issue numbers and commits in comments
Because GitHub pull requests are integrated with the rest of GitHub, you can reference parts of your git history in comments. This can be handy if you want to point someone to the historical significance of a piece of code.
Pro Free for Public/Open Source Projects
No pros yet!
Cons
Con Not free for non-open source code
Con No "acknowledgment" or "mark as reviewed"
The code review process should enforce the code to be reviewed by one or two peers at least to be "accepted" or "reviewed". On github, there is no such thing : no way to be sure that a PR has been reviewed by a certain number of reviewers.
No cons yet!