When comparing Antetype vs UXPin, the Slant community recommends Antetype for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” Antetype is ranked 18th while UXPin is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Antetype is:
Responsive design philosophy allows for dynamic layout and flexible sizing to adjust UI and adapt to different screen sizes quickly.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Dynamic layouts
Responsive design philosophy allows for dynamic layout and flexible sizing to adjust UI and adapt to different screen sizes quickly.
Pro Comprehensive widget library
200+ pre-designed widgets.
Pro Quick prototyping
Pro UXPin has great advanced features for prototyping
integration if this then dop that and custom javascript functionality
Pro Actively developed
UXPin is constantly being updated with new features.
Pro Import from PhotoShop and Sketch
A pro UXPin account will allow you to import existing projects from PhotoShop or Sketch.
Pro Extensive library of elements and patterns
UXPin offers elements from a wide range libraries. This includes responsive frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation, and libraries specific to mobile prototyping.
Cons
Con Expensive subscription model
$29 per user/mo ($350 pa) will soon rack up compared to a standalone product like Axure PRO ($450) which has a license that lasts years (they have given out free updates for the last 2 versions).
Con Steep learning curve
UXPin is one of the more complex prototyping tools. Combined with a lack of documentation, it can be discouraging for first time users.