When comparing Conjur vs Box Enterprise Key Management, the Slant community recommends Box Enterprise Key Management for most people. In the question“What are the best shared secret managers?” Box Enterprise Key Management is ranked 2nd while Conjur is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose Box Enterprise Key Management is:
Box provides dedicated hardware (HSMs) that the enterprise has complete control over and can provide access to Box in a granular way with Box in turn providing cloud services such as deduplication, search indexing, information rights management, etc.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can bundle different cloud services into a single interface
If a company uses more than a cloud service on which they run their platform, you don't need to use a different service to manage secrets for each of them, instead Conjur bundles all of them in a simple to use user interface.
Pro Easy setup
Setting up Conjur is pretty easy. All a user has to do is install the client, set up an account and through the guidance of the user interface, choose the operations with which the developers will use to control their data and servers.
Pro Provides tools for monitoring activity
Conjur provides detailed information on activity of all users and changes within the secret storage. It also provides graphs and comes with a warning system to make monitoring easier.
Pro Box provides cloud services with enterprise maintaining control over encryption keys
Box provides dedicated hardware (HSMs) that the enterprise has complete control over and can provide access to Box in a granular way with Box in turn providing cloud services such as deduplication, search indexing, information rights management, etc.
Cons
Con Costs more than the standard Box service
Box EKM is built as a complementary but still separate service than the storage service that Box provides. As such, it costs extra to use EKM to store secrets of data hosted with Box's cloud hosting.