Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Seamonkey vs QtWeb, the Slant community recommends Seamonkey for most people. In the question“What are the best lightweight web browsers?” Seamonkey is ranked 8th while QtWeb is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Seamonkey is:
Seamonkey is more than just an e-mail client as it is a full featured web browser as well. This makes for a good app to use for those that dislike having many different apps on their devices as it is a bit like an all in one solution.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Not just an e-mail client
Seamonkey is more than just an e-mail client as it is a full featured web browser as well. This makes for a good app to use for those that dislike having many different apps on their devices as it is a bit like an all in one solution.
Pro Auto imports setting from Thunderbird
For those that would be making the switch from the Thunderbird e-mail client setup is quite easy with Seamonkey as it auto imports all previous Thunderbird settings.
Pro Despite its very small size, it is self-contained: it does not depend on IE
Pro Windows version available in installer and portable (zip) formats
Pro Very lightweight with minimal system requirements
Pro Very small download
Windows: installer ~8MB; portable (zip) ~7.4MB
Pro Available for different operating systems
Windows, Linux, Unix and MacOS X.
Cons
Con Permanent CPU usage
Seamonkey permanently uses CPU (quite a few percents on a Intel i7). On a laptop this causes the fan to run (which make noise) and the battery to lasts less time.
Con It's not in active development
Last version (3.8.5) was released on Sep 9, 2013.
