Here’s the Deal

Precursor vs UXPin

6 1

12 0

When comparing Precursor vs UXPin, the Slant community recommends Precursor for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” Precursor is ranked 9th while UXPin is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Precursor is:

A free tier with all mockup functionality is available. Free tier is limited by lacking ability to save mockups privately and additional services provided by Precursor like voice chat and registered subdomains.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?

Pros

Pro
Free tier

Pro
Collaborate in real time

Share a link with teammates and they can jump right into your doc. You'll see their changes as they happen, and the built-in voice chat makes design meetings effortless.

Pro
Highly polished UX

Pro
UXPin has great advanced features for prototyping

integration if this then dop that and custom javascript functionality

Pro
Actively developed

UXPin is constantly being updated with new features.

Pro
Import from PhotoShop and Sketch

A pro UXPin account will allow you to import existing projects from PhotoShop or Sketch.

Pro
Extensive library of elements and patterns

UXPin offers elements from a wide range libraries. This includes responsive frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation, and libraries specific to mobile prototyping.

Ad
Cons

Con
Really simplistic

Basic tools (line, square, circle) wich do no stick together: if you move a circle the attached line won't move making reengineering the model simply impossible

Con
Expensive subscription model

$29 per user/mo ($350 pa) will soon rack up compared to a standalone product like Axure PRO ($450) which has a license that lasts years (they have given out free updates for the last 2 versions).