Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Google Web Fonts vs Friconix, the Slant community recommends Google Web Fonts for most people. In the question“What are the best web font embedding services?” Google Web Fonts is ranked 1st while Friconix is ranked 2nd. The most important reason people chose Google Web Fonts is:
Served off of Google's servers.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Reliable
Served off of Google's servers.
Pro Easy-to-use interface
The Google Web Fonts interface is straight forward and quick to use, allowing you to choose specific fonts and weights then creates the link tag for you.
Pro Free to use
Google Web Fonts is completely free to use.
Pro Large variety of icons
Pro Icons are nice
Pro Uniform style
Pro Customize your JS file
You can customize a JS file with only the icons you selected. Awesome, optimized and very fast !
Pro Add new icons on request
The Friconix guys add new icons when you request them. They are very reactive.
Pro Icons are free
Pro Font icons are homogeneous
Pro Very fast to load
You can create your custom small icon file.
Pro Documentation is clear
Documentation about icons is clear and easy to understand.
Cons
Con No asyncronous loading
The fonts.google.com suggest to use Typekit
Con Poor quality of some fonts
Many of the fonts provided by Google Web Fonts are of poor quality and design
Con Add link
When using icons in a paid application, a link to the Friconix website must be added.
