When comparing Atatus vs Errorception, the Slant community recommends Errorception for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript client-side error logging services?” Errorception is ranked 10th while Atatus is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Errorception is:
Errorception's script loads incredibly fast on your webpage, without affecting your site's load time at all.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Timeline feature breaks down user actions so you can better reproduce the issue
Atatus will break down the specific user actions that lead to an error, so you can see what they did before the error occurred. For example, you could see what they typed into a form, and what they clicked on that lead to the error.
Pro Monitors AJAX requests
Pro Monitors page load performance
Pro Easy integration with segment
Atatus has an integration with the segment setup api that allows you to set it up without having to find and paste keys.
Pro Extremely high performance
Errorception's script loads incredibly fast on your webpage, without affecting your site's load time at all.
Pro Reasonable pricing
Even though the company offers no free plan, their other plans are quite reasonably priced, with the micro plan starting at just $5 a month and a 500 errors/month quota.
Pro Provides all necessary Error tracking features
Errorception, along with its competitors provides the same vast set of tools, to make your life easier. Features include grouping of errors, noise reduction (caused by misbehaving plugins in client browsers), error filtering and Email alerts as well.
Cons
Con No Free Plan
Even though Errorception does offer a Free (No credit Card required) 30 day trial, the bug tracking service does not offer a Free plan, unlike some of the other services in the list.