When comparing MusicBrainz Picard vs Jaikoz, the Slant community recommends MusicBrainz Picard for most people. In the question“What are the best music organizer software to connect metadata to songs much like Shazam? ” MusicBrainz Picard is ranked 1st while Jaikoz is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose MusicBrainz Picard is:
Works on Windows, Mac, and Linux
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cross-platform
Works on Windows, Mac, and Linux
Pro Free
Doesn't cost a dime.
Pro Multiple ways of identifying tracks
Both Acoustic ID and already present metadata can be used to add in missing track info
Pro Uses Music Brains and Discogs
Plus the manual editing features seem decent, if needed.
Pro Simple & clear UI and workflow!
The interface is clean, simple and well organized. Not much voodoo involved, every button has a hover description which is enough to figure things out as you go.
Pro Free trial
Without save for more than 20 songs. But that's enough to see how it performs since it'll still show all the tags it finds.
Cons
Con Not much usable unless you have a whole Star Trek crew with you...
Used a couple times, maybe an hour of experience so far. Can't even understand what's happening yet!
- No simple 1-2-3 steps. Rather, 4 split panes, so many blobs of info, too many panes, columns, lines and subtleties, AND NO CLEAR WORKFLOW / DIRECTION to go!! The UI is so confusing!! Seriously, since when mp3 tagging became a science? Cmon geeks, USABILITY!! 1-2-3, BAM! Life's too short...
- Cluster: what's that? It's scary!!
- Lookup / Scan: why 2 buttons, isn't it the same thing?
- What's the work flow ? With a GUI, it should be obvious: step 1 do A, then 2 = B, 3 = C, etc etc... Why is there so many buttons and places to click ?
Ah what the heck, maybe we should just pay for a USABLE tool! ;-)
Con Missing database entries
While community members can freely add metadata to their database, less well-known albums and artists may not have additions.
