Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Rancher vs Bitbucket Pipelines, the Slant community recommends Rancher for most people. In the question“What are the best Continuous Integration services with Docker support?” Rancher is ranked 11th while Bitbucket Pipelines is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Rancher is:
Intuitive and easy to use web gui.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Web GUI cluster management
Intuitive and easy to use web gui.
Pro Mult-environment cluster system
- Cattle (Rancher default)
- Swarm
- Kubernetes
- Mesos
Pro Service catalog is easy
Rancher provides a catalog of application templates that make it easy to deploy complex stacks.
- Rancher certified catalog
- Community service catalog
Pro Self-service application stack for self-monitoring
Great contributions from the co community who build the service stack catalog.
One of them is the "Prometheus" template which deploys a collection of containers for monitoring a platform. It's capable of querying all aspects of your environment with some nice pre-built dashboards.
Pro Access control polices
Detailed role-based access control policies can be defined independently for each cluster.
Pro Provides time taken for each step
Eg:
./1.setup.sh 48s
./2.build.sh 56s
With this information, it's easy to find out which line of the script is the bottleneck of the build process.
Pro Great Jira integration
The same company Atlassian built Jira, which provides top-tier integration with Jira.
Pro Combined service: source control and CI
Cons
Con Only 50 mins/month free usage
The Free plan only gives you 50 minutes per month to run the build.
Con Sparse documentation and examples
