When comparing Kafka vs Snare, the Slant community recommends Kafka for most people. In the question“What are the best log management, aggregation & monitoring tools?” Kafka is ranked 8th while Snare is ranked 44th. The most important reason people chose Kafka is:
Kafka is optimized for supporting a huge number of users.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Optimized for performance
Kafka is optimized for supporting a huge number of users.
Pro Native mirroring support
Kafka has native support for mirroring.
Pro Native compression support
Kafka has native support for compression.
Pro Offered as a Cloud Service
Snare have hosted servers in most AWS locations.
Pro Uses Elastic Search as its Data Warehouse
Elasticsearch is recommended as a leader in its space handling high volumes of data.
Pro Full Log Analytics
All your log data, regardless of your log agent vendor can now be analysed through the web-based Dashboard.
Cons
Con Java is a resource hog
Java is a resource hog, making this far too slow unless you have money to throw at multiple servers with 1/2TB of ram.
Con Need Zookeeper
Kafka can only work with Zookeeper