Appenlight vs ODE
When comparing Appenlight vs ODE, the Slant community recommends Appenlight for most people. In the question“What are the best log management, aggregation & monitoring tools?” Appenlight is ranked 21st while ODE is ranked 35th. The most important reason people chose Appenlight is:
It's possible to trigger events on certain logs. For example log.error happens, or failed password text is found in logs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Log events system
It's possible to trigger events on certain logs. For example log.error happens, or failed password text is found in logs
Pro Error reporting
Sentry compatible and custom error reporting for most popular languages like JavaScript, Go, Python, Java, and PHP.
Pro Scales for Enterprises
Multi-node elasticsearch and scalable architecture easily supports 10000s+ of events/min
Pro Custom log Dashboards
Plot any type of graphs and aggregation with an easy to use composer.
Pro Scales easily
ODE instances are independent of each other, so they don't have to worry about a peer being added/removed. This allows the cluster to grow without any performance hit on the log aggregation. There is no redundancy built-in, but you can always use the forwarder to duplicate data. There is no sharding configuration or any other penalty that comes up with scaling a cluster. The clustering configuration is also very easy where you just list out peers for one of the node in order for it to run a search query on the whole cluster and merge the results. Scales better than any other open source log management tool out there.
Pro Add new parsers as you like
You can add any parser you want to ODE.
Pro Highly customizable
Pro Easy to use
Cons
Con Still in beta
Opallios ODE seems to be still in beta, as such there may be issues or missing features which are not yet implemented.