When comparing PixPlant vs Substance Painter, the Slant community recommends Substance Painter for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D texturing tools for game development?” Substance Painter is ranked 1st while PixPlant is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose Substance Painter is:
Since Substance Painter allows users to paint in full 3D, it can be used not only to paint full textures, but can also paint masks which can then be used in other tools (like Substance Designer) for material filter generators (like the ones used to make edge wear and dirt)
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Allows you to paint in full 3D
Since Substance Painter allows users to paint in full 3D, it can be used not only to paint full textures, but can also paint masks which can then be used in other tools (like Substance Designer) for material filter generators (like the ones used to make edge wear and dirt)
Pro Painting and procedural editing of textures
Cons
Con Closer to $150
The demo is the only free version out there, but it has a watermark option that can only be removed if you purchase the full version. And it isn't affordable for everyone.
Con Expensive and impossible to run without an expensive graphics card
The free trial is the only thing free. You'll have to pay a lot of money for the full version, and even if you do get it, you will have to pay for an expensive graphics card to use it, which means a lot more money flying out of your wallet and/or bank account.
Con Cannot export in a procedural format
You can not export substance (sbsar) files in Painter.