When comparing PixPlant vs Quixel Suite 2, the Slant community recommends Quixel Suite 2 for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D texturing tools for game development?” Quixel Suite 2 is ranked 2nd while PixPlant is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose Quixel Suite 2 is:
If you like Photoshop so much, Quixel Suite is for you as you never have to leave any tools behind.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro You don't have to leave Photoshop
If you like Photoshop so much, Quixel Suite is for you as you never have to leave any tools behind.
Pro Massive material library
You never have to download textures off the internet ever again as it comes with a very large material library to work with.
Pro Ability to paint directly on 3d models
The included 3Do viewer allows you to both view and paint on your models so you don't have to guess where that one spot is within your UV unwrap. Note that this is limited to painting masks, you cannot project textures.
Cons
Con Closer to $150
The demo is the only free version out there, but it has a watermark option that can only be removed if you purchase the full version. And it isn't affordable for everyone.
Con High hardware specs for smooth performance
This loads alot of texture data during typical use and comes with a fancy 3d viewer. If your hardware isn't up to spec, you will experience some major slowdowns when using it.
Con Obviously isn't free
It's the price of the full version of PixPaint plus $10
Con Only Works with Adobe Photoshop
Lack of options when it comes to Image Editing Software, especially since Photoshop is.not even free.
Con No longer supported
The development has stopped.
Con Doesn't always play nice with manually added layers
Quixel Suite basically takes over Photoshop in terms of layer creation and management. While you can still create layers manually, Quixel isn't always aware of it and may confuse the software.