42
User
Recs.
Recs.
25
Updates
Last
Updated
Updated
Activity
16 Options
SpecsUpdate
PriceFree
PlatformsWeb
Scripting languageJavascript, Typescript, ES6 Ecmascript
Pros
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Cons
Con Poor code structure
There's little in terms of cohesiveness in classes, methods or patterns. Forced OOP structure over JavaScript prototypes.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Recommendations
Phaser
Recommended 6 years ago
I made a lot of game with ! Phaser is my life!
Pro
Beginner-friendlyPhaser
Recommended 6 years ago
Phaser is an excellent, fully featured game framework that feels like actionScript. It's very easy to transition from flash development to Phaser because of the very reason. It works based on a stage, and has every feature that I've ever wanted in a JS game engine. Phaser has a community version (2....
Pro
Beginner-friendlyCon
Poor code structurePro
Targets mobile browsersCon
Poor documentation for Phaser 3Pro
Extensive support for texture atlases and loading all kinds of contentPro
Built in camera supportPro
Open sourcedPhaser
Recommended 4 years ago
I've made many games with it. I can tell you that it is the easiest and more powerful 2D framework for games.
Pro
Beginner-friendlyPro
Targets mobile browsersPro
Extensive support for texture atlases and loading all kinds of contentPro
Built in camera supportPro
Open sourcedPhaser
6 years ago
It's the most popular, but sadly also the most sloppy 2D JS game framework. The vast majority of all the available tutorial focuses on the basics and almost none on project structure or writing maintainable code.
Pro
Beginner-friendlyCon
Poor code structureCon
Poor documentation for Phaser 3Con
Poorly designed API; exposes everythingCon
Difficult to make the viewport responsivePro
Extensive support for texture atlases and loading all kinds of content