Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

Covered by "Requires payment for commercial projects".

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

duplicate

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

covered by the Non-free/libre con, so I am marking this as a duplicate, sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

this information has already been covered by a different pro, so I'm flagging this as a duplicate, sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

flagging this, as this pro has been covered by previous pros. Sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

This pro is a duplicate of a previously existing pro, so I am flagging this, sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

this has already been covered by a previous pro, so I'm flagging it as a duplicate, sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

flagging this pro as it is a duplicate of an already existing one, sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

this is a duplicate of an already existing pro, so I am flagging this, sorry!

Simona
Simona
@Simona
2 years ago

this pro is a duplicate of an already existing pro, flagging this, sorry!

teadan
teadan
@teadan
4 years ago

This recommendation does not appear to be compatible with Linux - therefore not a very good fit for the question.

PatientFionnuala
PatientFionnuala
@PatientFionnuala2320
4 years ago

Requires use of paid plan if the user wants to use it for private repos.

DeterminedNotus
DeterminedNotus
@DeterminedNotus9646
4 years ago

For me other clients are confusing and SmartGit gets UI just right. I can always easily achieve the tree shape I intend to have.

Monika
Monika
@monikav
5 years ago

Sorry to flag this but there is already a pro about GitAhead being free and open source.

ideasman42
ideasman42
@ideasman42
5 years ago

should be removed.

piR
piR
@piR
6 years ago

No Linux version exists for this client... It is only Mac or Windows (https://desktop.github.com/)

Subhamoy Sengupta
Subhamoy Sengupta
@SubhamoySengupta
7 years ago

This is true for every portable git client except SmartGit.

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
7 years ago
@SubhamoySengupta 

Not really, Magit is very complete feature-wise for example.

ArtisticBieggolmai
ArtisticBieggolmai
@ArtisticBieggolmai2733
6 years ago
@endi-sukaj 

Sure, if you are using emacs, but I am using vim

Andre
6 years ago

It has been introduced in v2.3: https://blog.axosoft.com/gitkraken-v2-3/

Chuck Dries
Chuck Dries
@ChuckDries
6 years ago

We fixed this recently!

meikl
meikl
@meikl
6 years ago

duplicate of non-free/libre

Ray
6 years ago
@meikl 

It doesn't seem to be a duplicate; the non-free/libre con addresses the closed source aspect, but provides no explicit information about requiring a paid license for commercial usage.

meikl
meikl
@meikl
6 years ago
@ray-chen 

Then I'll change the text.

Ray
6 years ago
@meikl 

Thanks! :-)

meikl
meikl
@meikl
6 years ago

Which Git functionality has been renamed? Could you please name at least 2 (because of "some")?

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
6 years ago
@meikl 

squash has been renamed to join. It's essentially the labels of the buttons that have been renamed, the functionality is still the same.

meikl
meikl
@meikl
6 years ago
@endi-sukaj 

Where do you see the "join"? In the commit window I see "squash", as well as in the journal. It's rather the opposite - some Mercurial features have been renamed to the Git names, e.g. "revert" instead of "backout".

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
6 years ago
@meikl 

Sorry, I haven't used SmartGit for a long time, do you think it would be better to edit the title to say that some Mercurial features have been renamed?

meikl
meikl
@meikl
6 years ago
@endi-sukaj 

Definitely.

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
6 years ago
@meikl 

Will do that. Thanks!

meikl
meikl
@meikl
6 years ago

What do you mean?

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
8 years ago

This looks extremely interesting. Though I want to ask, how is the performance of ungit? Being web-based it probably isn't as good as native. Maybe I'm wrong though.

Michael Sperber
Michael Sperber
@MichaelSperber
6 years ago
@endi-sukaj 

I run it locally, it comes with a stand alone server (nodejs) that listens to you local port 8448. That works great. No performance problems at all. I do sometimes see it forgets to update the screen, i need to refresh the screen myself. This being open source and actively being developed makes it very attractive imho.

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
6 years ago
@MichaelSperber 

Oh wow, I had forgotten about this. Thanks for the reply Michael, will give it a go myself now :)

Belle
7 years ago

Hey there! I hope you don’t mind, I removed the bit of your description that was in first person. Does it sound ok? We prefer second or third which makes it friendlier for others to edit.
Thanks for your contribution!

WhiteLilac
WhiteLilac
@WhiteLilac
7 years ago

GitHub does not support Linux, so it does not fit under this question.

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
7 years ago
@WhiteLilac 

GitHub

I think you meant Git Tower. But yes, you are right as there's no Linux support.

WhiteLilac
WhiteLilac
@WhiteLilac
7 years ago

The option does not fit under this question, since it does not support Linux.

Luca Orlandi
Luca Orlandi
@luca-orlandi
7 years ago

What is this doing here if ther's no Linux version? The question concerns "The best graphical git client for Linux"

WhiteLilac
WhiteLilac
@WhiteLilac
7 years ago
@luca-orlandi 

@luca-orlandi Thank you for pointing it out! The option shouldn't be under this question, I will flag it.

Paolo
Paolo
@slyce
7 years ago

Thanks for sharing your experience with this git client :)

Oliver Russell
Oliver Russell
@OliverRussell
7 years ago

QGit is another awesome Git GUI client for Linux. I would recommend you to try it out. https://www.cloudways.com/blog/best-git-gui-clients/#linux

Med Medin
Med Medin
@MedMedin
7 years ago

Eclipse Git Plugin (EGit) is the best, cross platforms, easy to use and well integrated with the IDE.

Med Medin
Med Medin
@MedMedin
7 years ago

Eclipse Git Plugin is the best, easy to use and well integrated with the IDE.

Bryan
Bryan
@Xavi
7 years ago

As far as I know, this isn't available for Linux.

Sean Lang
Sean Lang
@slang
7 years ago

(this is a con, but slant has a retarded design that doesn't allow me to switch pros/cons or delete & resubmit)

Laura Kyle
Laura Kyle
@LauraNK
7 years ago
@slang 

If you leave a comment asking for something to be changed, we can often get to it in under 10 minutes.
Done :)

Stuart Kearney
Stuart Kearney
@stukearney
7 years ago
@slang 

If you have any other design things you'd like us to fix just let me know and I'll get on it. Also you can change your @username to slang via the edit in your profile if you like.

Sean Lang
Sean Lang
@slang
7 years ago
@stukearney 

Oh sweet! - I've been sitting on that username for awhile but didn't notice username edits had been implemented.

Actually, that pro/con switch was the only thing that really bothered me, because I've made that mistake at least 4 other times and couldn't fix it on my own. However, I would love to see "linked solutions" between questions. Such that I could submit a program like "GitLab" as a solution to a question, work on a really nice description/set of images/metadata, and then reuse that in a solution for a different question. Plus, it would make site-wide price or description updates really easy.

Also, it would be great if "licensing" were an attribute on solutions like price is. This doesn't need to be exact licensing data (like the full text of the EULA or the SPDX license code) - a simple breakdown between "Free/Libre" and "Non-Free" would be great. This is obviously separate from price, since Free software could be distributed at a cost (even if it usually isn't), and Non-Free software might be given away gratis.

Maxim Kamalov
Maxim Kamalov
@MaximKamalov
7 years ago

Would be nice to know more about this.

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
7 years ago
@MaximKamalov 

About gitg in general or this specific pro?

Maxim Kamalov
Maxim Kamalov
@MaximKamalov
7 years ago
Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
7 years ago
@MaximKamalov 

As far as this pro goes, which I will update:

The UI is very straightforward, once you open it, you can browse your computer to find an existing git repository and open it in the app. Once opened you can browse commits and view remotes immediately. It also allows you to browse the files and preview them.

There's also a commit view which shows past commit messages, as well as unstaged and untracked commits.

Laura Kyle
Laura Kyle
@LauraNK
7 years ago

Hey! What would you say makes this a pro?

toanle
toanle
@toanle
7 years ago
@LauraNK 

Personal favorite! Emacs is my only text editor.

Endi Sukaj
Endi Sukaj
@endi-sukaj
7 years ago
@toanle 

Maybe we can edit this pro to: "Great for people already using Emacs"?

thermoplastics
thermoplastics
@thermoplastics
7 years ago

Hey, just a heads up, I flagged this due to the first person text, as it does not fit with Slant's writing guide. No big deal, just wanted to alert you as to why this was flagged. :)

undefinedurl nextprice drop