Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to web2py?
Ad
Ad
Flask
All
11
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Minimalist without losing power
Flask is very easy to get up and going, with vanilla HTML or with bootstrap pieces. It doesn't take much lines of Python to load Flask to get headers working, etc, and since it's all modular you don't have to have something you don't want in your application.
See More
Top
Con
Not async-friendly
Flask is explicitly not designed to handle async programming.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of resources available online
Flask is one of the most popular Python web frameworks, if not the most popular one. As such, there's plenty of guides, tutorials, and libraries available for it. A large number of important Python libraries, such as SQLAlchemy have libraries for Flask, which add valuable bindings to make the development process and the integration between these libraries and Flask as easy as possible.
See More
Top
Con
Setting up a large project requires some previous knowledge of the framework
Setting up a large project with Flask is not that easy considering how there's no "official" way of doing it. Blueprints are a useful tool in this regard but require some additional reading and are a bit tricky to get right for a beginner. The lack of some defaults can also be problematic. Having to choose between different libraries for a certain task is never easy, especially if you have never worked with Flask before.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely easy to build a quick prototype
Even though it's pretty minimalistic out of the box, Flask still provides the necessary tools to build a quick prototype for a web app right after a fresh install. With all the main components pretty much packed in the flask package, building a simple web app in a single Python file is as easy as it gets.
See More
Top
Con
Threadlocals and globals used everywhere
The default way of creating applications in flask makes it hard to use reusable and clean code.
See More
Top
Pro
Very flexible
Flask gives developers a lot of flexibility in how they develop their web applications. For example, the choice of not having an ORM, but instead choosing one suited to the task, or another area where Flask gives a lot of options to developers is the templating. They can use Jinja2, Flask's default templating language or choose from a number of different templating languages they desire.
See More
Top
Con
HTML-oriented, not API-oriented
Not necessarily designed for making APIs, though that is possible
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
The official documentation is very thorough and complete. Everything is explained in-depth and followed by extremely well-explained tutorials that tackle real-world problems.
See More
Top
Pro
Able to use ORM or "true SQL"
See More
Specs
License:
BSD License
Written in:
Python
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
306
67
Django
All
13
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Con
Can feel bloated for small projects
Django's sheer scale and functionality can feel clunky and bloated for small applications. It has too many bells and whistles which can get in the way when developing a small scale application.
See More
Top
Pro
Developing a simple prototype can be very fast
Django's philosophy of batteries included means that experienced developers won't have to plan too much ahead on what kind of application infrastructure they need and instead just start developing web applications quickly.
See More
Top
Con
The documentation does not cover real-world scenarios
It is a larger documentation indeed, however is not deep and covers non real problems or even don't show any examples. You'll be better with Google or Stackoverflow
See More
Top
Pro
ORM support out of the box
Django supports Object-Relational Mapping. With models defined as Python classes which are actually subclasses of Django's django.db.models.Model. Each attribute of the model is then represented as a database field. Queries are lazily executed and Django gives developers an automatically-generated database-access API.
See More
Top
Con
Routing requires some knowledge of regular expressions
Given a GET request for /topics/426/viewpoints/1/sections/create, how does Django decide which bit of Python code is invoked to handle it? It compares the request path to your giant pile of regular expressions. And then if there's some other regular expression starts matching /top and all your requests for /topics/ start going there, good luck figuring out why. You won't be informed of any conflict until you notice you seem to be getting the wrong pages back. The structure of URL paths is almost universally hierarchal. There is no call to have anything as ridiculously flexible (and notoriously hard-to-read) as regular expressions to organize request routing.
See More
Top
Pro
Top notch documentation and help from community
The official Django documentation is probably some of the best around. Well written, thorough and they explain every little detail of the framework. Django is also a very popular tool, with an extensive community and a lot of experienced developers that have been using it for years. This means that there are a lot of guides and tutorials out there for new and experienced developers alike.
See More
Top
Con
Template errors fail silently by default
If you make a typo in a template variable, or change a view so that variable is no longer passed to the template, you won't get an error message pointing out that something has gone wrong. That reference will just be treated as if it is an empty string instead. There is a way to configure this, but since so many templates have been written assuming this behavior, nobody ever enables template errors because it would break so much of the existing support tools (e.g. the built-in admin interface).
See More
Top
Pro
Highly customizable
Django is in itself a highly customizable web framework. The database, template framework and ORM can all be swapped out.
See More
Top
Pro
Has an admin panel out of the box
Django comes with a highly customizable admin panel and authentication out of the box. This makes the development and production of a simple CMS extremely easy.
See More
Top
Pro
Mature software with many plugins developed over the years
Django was first released in 2005, it has had a lot of time to mature and become better with each release. It also has by far the largest community out of all python frameworks who have continuously over the years built and maintained many powerful plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
Clear and defined MVC organization
Django follows some pretty well established MVC patterns. With everything in place and where requests follow a clear path through urlresolvers, middleware, view and context processors.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple database management
Just a few lines of code can instruct Django to create all the tables and fields required in your database automatically. Schemas are managed with "migrations", that are also created automatically, and can be rolled out from your development box and implemented on production systems with just a single command. This performs any database changes required, from table creation, indexes, renaming fields, and pre-populating initial data. Each migration builds on the previous migrations, so you can trace the evolution of your data and even recreate the layout of your database at any point in the lifecycle of your application.
See More
Specs
Multi Language Support:
Excellent
Written in:
Python
Default Template Engine:
Django
Default ORM:
Django ORM
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
531
115
FastAPI
All
17
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Dependency injection
It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc.
See More
Top
Con
Smaller community
Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. But it can grow with time.
See More
Top
Pro
Standards
It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0.
See More
Top
Pro
Data validation
It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests.
See More
Top
Pro
High-performance
It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks.
See More
Top
Pro
Editor completion
It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere.
See More
Top
Pro
One of the fastest growing communities
See More
Top
Pro
Fast is really fast (!)
It's easy to develop API based applications in Python on deadlines for Android and IOS Development.
See More
Top
Pro
Automatic docs
It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code.
See More
Top
Pro
Database independent
It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL.
See More
Top
Pro
Async IO / optional
It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately.
See More
Top
Pro
World class documentation
It has some of the best documentation of any framework.
See More
Top
Pro
WebSockets
Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets.
See More
Top
Pro
OAuth 2.0
It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it.
See More
Top
Pro
Background tasks
Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports GraphQL
Python's graphene library is included as an optional dependency meaning that GraphQL API's are supported out of the box, with no additional tweaking needed.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Cross-platform
License:
MIT
Type:
standard and feature rich micro-framework
Initial Release:
2019
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
193
29
Pyramid
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Very flexible
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
See More
Top
Con
The great number of options it offers can become intimidating
One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it.
See More
Top
Pro
Persistence agnostic
Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin).
See More
Top
Pro
Comes with security included
Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends.
See More
Specs
Written in:
Python
Default Template Engine:
Jinja2
Default ORM:
SqlAlchemy
Hide
Get it
here
48
5
Bottle
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Flexible
Being a small one file distribution it includes almost every vital thing you need to support little websites (routing, templating). Everything else can be implemented using plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Small community. Difficult to find online docs and examples
See More
Top
Pro
Single-file distribution
Bottle works around the one-file approach, everything is done in a bottle.py file. This means that it's extremely easy to share and upload your application since it practically is just one python file.
See More
Top
Con
Very hard to develop projects that are not smaller than 1000 lines
While Bottle is a great framework for building small applications (generally less than 1000 lines of code), it starts getting very hard to manage your application if you want to go even a bit larger than that. The fact that it follows a single-file distribution model and that it's missing something like Flask's blueprints only make this problem worse.
See More
Top
Pro
No need to install
It is so little there's no need to install, it is included in the standard libs python.
See More
Top
Pro
Async, *let friendly
Using it with gevent is a breeze. It's a WSGI app so it's easy to make it work with anything.
See More
Top
Pro
Truly magnificent
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
46
2
Falcon
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Con
Limited in scope
Being designed around building REST APIs and the fact that it's minimalistic with very few dependencies makes Falcon opinionated (you should build a REST API) and limited in scope (you shouldn't be using Falcon to build a news site, blog or ecommerce platform).
See More
Top
Pro
Built to build REST APIs
Falcon is designed entirely around building REST APIs. It achieves this helps a lot with it being lightweight and simple. It also helps developers take some design choices which would otherwise not be possible with a more general-purpose framework,
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight with minimal dependencies
Falcon is a very lightweight framework. This can be noticed simply by looking at the dependency list: other than the python standard library, six and mimeparse are the only dependencies.
See More
Top
Pro
Performance is really awesome
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Technology:
Javascript
Hide
Get it
here
26
4
Wagtail
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Extendable
Although Wagtail comes with only the most basic features, it's by no means an incomplete CMS. It's very extendable and it's up to the developer to choose how to extend it.
See More
Top
Con
ImageChooser widgets dont fully work in sub panels
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight with the most useful functionalities
Wagtail is a simple and lightweight CMS with the most basic and useful set of features baked in out of the box.
See More
Top
Con
You need to be experienced in Django to get the most of it
Installing Wagtail on a remote server is a little more complicated than FTPing a bunch of files. Furthermore there's no ecosystem for plugins and themes so it can only be fully extended by a developer experienced with Django.
See More
Top
Pro
Great separation between developers and editors
Wagtail has the perfect separation between developers and editors. It allows you to construct a site with minimal fuss with features like the awesome stream field and hand it over to virtually any content editor. You can build the site with no knowledge of Django and with the simple interface require no training to get started. Although this will always require developer time, with 2 or 3 days you can quickly get up a boilerplate site that will fulfill 80% of any site you will develop. Leaving only the bespoke parts to do. It also nicely slots into any Django project with no fuss.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
59
0
Yii
All
13
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Rapid development through code scaffolding
Yii takes care of repetitive tasks through Gii, a web-based scaffolding tool. Gii takes care of code generation and creating code templates for: Models Controllers Forms Modules Extensions CRUD controller actions and views There are a lot of scaffolding templates made by community for Gii, that improve generated code functionality by a lot. Gii is very easy to extend yourself.
See More
Top
Con
Can be hard for beginners
Since Yii requires developers to write code following certain rules, or in other words, it requires developers to follow the "Yii way of doing things" it can be hard for beginners to warm up to it and start using it right away.
See More
Top
Pro
Comes with important security standarts
Since security is a crucial part of any application, Yii comes with great security features out of the box to help developers create a secure and reliable application. These security features contain but are not restricted to: Input validation Output filtering Features against SQL injection Cross-site scripting prevention
See More
Top
Con
Not very good at many to many relations
(but there is a good plugin, namely CAdvancedArBehavior extension to do this)
See More
Top
Pro
Highly extensible
Yii is built to be extremely extensible. Virtually every component of the framework can be extended programmatically. For example, if you want to add a unique id to your views, it's very easy to do: namespace app\components; class View extends yii\web\View { public $bodyId; /* Yii allows you to add magic getter methods by prefacing method names with "get" */ public function getBodyIdAttribute() { return ($this->bodyId != '') ? 'id="' . $this->bodyId . '"' : ''; } }
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated with a testing framework
Yii makes use of Codeception, a great PHP testing framework that helps developers run their tests. They can be unit, functional or acceptance tests since Codeception supports them all.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of plugins available
Yii has about 2000 addons hosted on Yii's official website. These addons significantly decrease development time and increase the developer's efficiency.
See More
Top
Pro
License
Yii is free and open source and is distributed under the BSD License.
See More
Top
Pro
Strong community support
Yii has a strong and rather large community behind it. This is proven by the great number of blog posts, tutorials, guides and reviews on the Yii framework as well as the great number of extensions developed for it.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to install
Yii uses Composer to handle it's dependency installation. This is rather easy and not very time consuming, although it should be noted that Composer is very resource-intensive considering what it's job is. But that is not really Yii's fault.
See More
Top
Pro
Best framework for CRUD operation
Yii Framework Provides most of features require for crud functionalities like GridView, Listview and DetailView (with jquery search and validation functions) by generating using GII.
See More
Top
Pro
Highly extensible without effort
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.4+
Default Template Engine:
Twig
Default ORM:
Yii Active Record
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
118
26
jam.py
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Clean and simple Application Builder, easy to learn and get results fast
No need to learn huge 'Djangoish' frameworks. Easy to deploy with Apache, small deployment footprint. Security built in the App.
See More
Top
Con
Still need to learn Python etc to get the full potential of Jam.py
General Python, JS, etc. knowledge is still needed to fully take advantage of Jam.py.
See More
Top
Pro
Great for non-developers looking to visualize data
You can get productive with jam.py really quick even if you have little to no development experience. A dashboard can be built pretty quickly with minimal effort.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
18
0
Plone
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source
Not only does this provides complete transparency to the user, it also enables a large base of developers to work simultaneously on solving any arising the issues and improving the platform.
See More
Top
Pro
Remarkable level of security
Plone has been around for almost two decates and to date less than 50 vulnerabilities were discovered in the platform. That's at least ten times less than any of the popular alternatives, including Wordpress, Drupal, and Joomla. In fact, government agencies, such as NASA and FBI use Plone for its high level of security.
See More
Top
Pro
Can run on virtually anything
Plone runs on Windows, Mac, Linux, Chromebooks, RaspberryPi, servers, and cloud services.
See More
Top
Pro
Multilingual UI and documentation
Plone platform along with all documentation is available in more than 40 languages, including Chinese, Japanese, Greek, Arabic, and Hebrew.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Technology:
Python
Hide
Free
44
1
Dropwizard
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Enhanced productivity and less timewasting
The application can be run and debugged from the IDE without the need to recompile or redeploy the WAR file. This is because a Dropwizard web application creates on main program which starts the jetty container.
See More
Top
Con
Does not allow a lot a freedom of choice
Dropwizard removes a lot of freedom that the developer may have with other frameworks because of the fact that it tries to do everything itself. It chooses the best Java libraries for the job required, without allowing the developer much choice.
See More
Top
Pro
Application metrics integrated into the framework
Dropwizard comes with application metrics integrated out of the box. These metrics provide a lot of useful information such as request/response time. For example, to get the execution time of a method, the @Timed annotation is used.
See More
Top
Pro
Quick project bootstrap
Starting a project with Dropwizard si very easy and bootstraping is quick and painless. All that's needed is a single dependency added in the pom.xml file and it's ready to go.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
8
0
Quokka CMS
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Easy to deploy on OpenShift
You can deploy easily to OpenShift free account - out of the box support - just give quokka github url on app creation form on OpenShift and done!
See More
Top
Con
Still incomplete, work in progress
It is still incomplete, in need of contributions, no stable release yet!
See More
Top
Pro
NoSQL Schema Free Database
Gives you flexibility to develop modules/plugins
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to create new themes and modules
You only need Jinja, Python and a Blueprint to create themes and modules
See More
Hide
Get it
here
6
0
TurboGears
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Starts as a microframework and scales up to a fullstack solution
Allows developers to build quick, simple web prototypes or scale up to create complex web applications.
See More
Top
Con
The great extensibility can feel overwhelming
Sometimes TurboGears' extensibility and feeling of having different options for doing a single thing can feel overwhelming and as if writing everything from scratch.
See More
Top
Pro
A powerful and flexible Object Relational Mapper (ORM) with real multi-database support
SQLAlchemy is a powerful ORM which is highly regarded in the Python community. TurboGears' ORM is built with SQLAlchemy, which gives it a great deal of flexibility and power.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for Horizontal data partitioning (aka, sharding)
TurboGears allows for horizontal data partitioning, which allows the division of logical datatabases into smaller elements.
See More
Top
Pro
Built in extensibility Pluggable Applications and standard WSGI components
Allows for creating extendable Pluggable Applications which extend the framework itself through endpoints provided by TurboGears.
See More
Top
Pro
Validated and compile time checked template engine
The template engine is XHTML based and so is validated for errors when compiled to HTML. You will never serve a broken page again due to a forgotten close tag.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
4
0
Opps CMS
All
4
Experiences
Pros
4
Top
Pro
Flexible
Totally customizable.. You can create any kind of web application in django architecture to run builtin Opps
See More
Top
Pro
Scalable
From few visitors to million of visitors, it's the best toolkit to build your web project
See More
Top
Pro
API for custom container types
Build any type of application integrating Opps thought its API
See More
Top
Pro
Container manager
Very powerful content administration
See More
Hide
Get it
here
3
0
Hapi
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Backed by a major corporation
Hapi was developed and is still being used by Walmart. Being backed by such a major company means that it will not lose support any time soon and most importantly it's being developed by professionals and that you will always get support for it.
See More
Top
Con
Requires too much boilerplate
Hapi seems to be made with large applications in mind. The sheer amount of boilerplate code it requires is simply not practical for a small web app. This also means that there are few examples of Hapi applications around for beginners to learn from.
See More
Top
Pro
Consistency across applications
Hapi's philosophy is that configuration is more important than code. This is especially useful for very large teams because it helps developers maintain consistency and reusability throughout their code.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Cross-platform
License:
BSD-3-Clause
Written in:
JavaScript
Repository:
https://github.com/hapijs/hapi
See All Specs
Hide
Get it
here
34
4
TsED
All
5
Experiences
Pros
5
Top
Pro
Brings MVC to Express
One of the conns of Express (even in this site) is the lack of structure. This framework brings structure to Express applications which makes large-scale development much easier
See More
Top
Pro
Uses decorators
Similar to most other popular frameworks
See More
Top
Pro
Adding string types to Express with Typescript
Express is already an awesome framework, but with types it makes the work much easier
See More
Top
Pro
Great support
Any issue opened gets resolved or answered very quickly
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
Updated regularly
See More
Hide
Get it
here
2
0
CodeBehind
All
7
Experiences
Pros
7
Top
Pro
Modern
CodeBehind is a modern framework with revolutionary ideas.
See More
Top
Pro
Code-Behind
Code-Behind pattern will be fully respected.
See More
Top
Pro
Under .NET Core
Your project will still be under ASP.NET Core and you will benefit from all the benefits of .NET Core.
See More
Top
Pro
Get output
You can call the output of the aspx page in another aspx page and modify its output.
See More
Top
Pro
Modular
It is modular. Just copy the new project files, including dll and aspx, into the current active project.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple
Developing with CodeBehind is very simple. You can use mvc pattern or model-view or controller-view or only view.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
The CodeBehind framework is faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
2
0
Phalcon
All
11
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Extremely fast
Since the framework is and extension built in C it's extremely fast and efficient. It's actually one of the fastest PHP frameworks, and according to some benchmarks it's the fastest framework out there.
See More
Top
Con
Not for shared hosting
Phalcon needs root access to install the PHP extension which is written in C. Developers who plan on using Phalcon must use VPS or Cloud Hosting with root access available.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
Phalcon is open source and is available under the BSD License.
See More
Top
Con
Require good programming skills
Not so easy to use if you want to gain the best from it.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses Volt template engine
The Volt template engine, which is embedded into Phalcon itself takes it's inspiration from the Jinja template engine and as such it's nice to look at, with a clear and understandable syntax. Volt also compiles very fast, like Phalcon itself, so it avoids being a bottleneck for the framework's overall speed.
See More
Top
Con
Debugging requires knowledge of C
You need to be a C programmer to debug Zephir or C code. Or if Phalcon is not maintained anymore and you have a problem and don't have much skills in C, you will be hard-pressed to find a C programmer to fix it.
See More
Top
Pro
Very flexible project structure
You can set up the base project as you want. It's very flexible
See More
Top
Pro
Clean and light project code
Since the framework code is not in the project directory, the code is light and clean.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable with Zephir
Zephir is a high-level language designed to create PHP extensions easily by PHP programmers with no knowledge in C. Zephir does this by compiling directly to C and then the C program is in turn compiled to be run as a PHP extension. This, coupled with the fact that Zephir's syntax is very similar to PHP makes it a perfect way for PHP developers to use it for customizing Phalcon.
See More
Top
Pro
Loosely coupled components
Some components can be used as standalone packages like models, views, etc..
See More
Specs
Written in:
PHP
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
115
13
Rocket
All
13
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy To Use
Rocket makes extensive use of Rust's code generation tools to provide a clean API.
See More
Top
Con
Abandoned
See More
Top
Pro
Streams
Rocket streams all incoming and outgoing data, so size isn't a concern.
See More
Top
Con
Nightly
Uses only nightly versions of Rust.
See More
Top
Pro
Cookies
View, add, or remove cookies, with or without encryption, without hassle.
See More
Top
Pro
Testing Library
Unit test your applications with ease using the built-in testing library.
See More
Top
Pro
Extensible
Easily create your own primitives that any Rocket application can use.
See More
Top
Pro
Templating
Rocket makes rendering templates a breeze with built-in templating support.
See More
Top
Pro
Query Strings
Handling query strings and parameters is type-safe and easy in Rocket.
See More
Top
Pro
Type Safe
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something.
See More
Top
Pro
Boilerplate Free
Spend your time writing code that really matters, and let Rocket generate the rest.
See More
Top
Pro
Config Environments
Configure your application your way for development, staging, and production.
See More
Specs
Written in:
Rust
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
49
7
CherryPy
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Robust configuration mechanism
It's very easy to choose what processes you want by turning them on or off. You can also configure per-URL as well.
See More
Top
Con
Lacking good documentation
CherryPy's documentation could use some work. It generally feels very slim and is seriously lacking in some parts. For a beginner who is just starting with Python Frameworks, working with CherryPy's documentation would be very hard.
See More
Top
Pro
Has production-ready server
Comes with a production level wsgi server that can be used instead of / in addition to gunicorn etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Helps you organize the structure of your code
CherryPy provides some dispatcher patterns that support a wide range of functionality and provide some helpful ways of organizing the code.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
11
2
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop