What are the best web frameworks to create a web REST API?

Question

APIWeb DevelopmentRest

What are the best web frameworks to create a web REST API?

42

Options
Considered

1.4K

User
Recs.

Feb 2, 2024

Last
Updated

37 Options Considered

Best web frameworks to create a web REST API	Price	Written in	Platforms
89 Express.js	Free	JavaScript	Cross-platform
81 Go	Free	-	Windows, Linux, Mac etc.
81 Spring Boot	-	Java	Cross-platform
80 FastAPI	Free	Python	Cross-platform
76 Laravel	-	PHP	-

See Full List

Node.js

Built By the Slant team

Find the best product instantly.

4.7 star rating

Try it now - it's free

score 309 · Answer 1

Express.js

Top Pro

Can make use of a great number of plugins

Express takes advantage of Node's NPM to distribute and install countless plugins made by third parties which solve almost anything a developer would want to do with Express. See More

Top Con

you need to learn new trending things every day

ES6 ? maybe ES7?did you hear flow? Reason? Elm? TypeScript? mongoose? sequelize? maybe typeORM? a Hot new ORM comes : Knex . only few month later :RxDb chai? okey i'm go with mocha. but Jest is hot right now good luck re-learning every day See More

CoolPodaga's Experience

Node.JS is a great ecosystem for creating web applications as the back-end and front-end code are the same. It runs lightning fast, and has no end of support online. The documentation for JavaScript, Express, and all other systems is great. See More

Specs

Written in:JavaScript

Platforms:Cross-platform

License:MIT

Repository:https://github.com/expressjs/express

See All Specs

Top Pro

Easy to learn for people who have a little experience in backend dev

The fact that it's a JavaScript framework means that it's easy to learn for people who have even a minimal background in backend dev but they have experience in developing for the frontend, since JavaScript is a language most frontend developers are very familiar with. See More

Top Con

No single recommended way of doing something

Express considers itself to be a "minimalistic unopinionated framework", it basically lets the developer determine how their project will be organized. On one hand, this gives anyone terrific power and flexibility to use any library they want for a certain task and to organize their project structure however they want. But on the other hand, there's no single recommended way of organizing things, which can be a trap for beginners and experienced developers alike and result in unmaintainable projects. See More

SplendidIlmarinen's Experience

puwerfull See More

Top Pro

Massive ecosystem of Middleware

If you have not already checked out the Express.js ecosystem of middleware, you should. See More

Top Con

Messed up JavaScript ecosystem

DreamerOkuninushi's Experience

When developing with express, it does not offer the same quality, experience or performance as alternatives. It's common to hear about "dependency hell" or "middleware hell", and it's not well suited for big solutions. I would recommend Go before any node js for backend development, unless you need anything JS specific. hapi framework seems like a good replacement for express if you need to use nodejs. See More

Top Pro

Great routing API

Express' extremely powerful routing API allows developers to do tasks ranging from building a REST API to building the routes for a simple web app and then take it to the next level by using route parameters and query strings. See More

Top Con

Not great for data science

If you wanted to connect to Python Data Science files, there isn't really a good way to connect JS and Python, whereas, with a python framework like Flask or Django, you can easily just connect the files since everything is in Python. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

hard to control big projects See More

Top Pro

Lightweight

Top Con

Not good as its hypes

Top Pro

Good documentation

Express.js is really well documented. Everything is covered and they are very helpful for beginners and advanced developers alike. See More

Top Con

NPM hurts more than it helps

Because anyone and their brother, sister, best friend, oldest friend, mother, father, and dog have an idea they would like to publish as a Node.JS plugin to the world -- and they want to use all of their best friends plugins you have a dependency chain with more links than there are stars in the sky each time you choose to add a simple NPM module/plugin. Be wary, my friends. See More

Top Pro

Setting up is very easy

Setting up a new Express project is very easy. It consists of installing a handful of libraries through NPM run a single npm install and everything is ready to go. See More

Top Con

Hard to control big projects

Top Pro

Great for beginner Node.js programmers

With a little learning curve, it is a good choice for new NodeJS developers to get started quickly. Express boasts great, thorough documentation. See More

Top Con

Doesn't support HTTP2

Top Pro

Great supportive community

Express has a big community with a lot of guides and tutorials written about it by developers that have been using it for quite some time. See More

Top Con

Working with relational databases can be a hassle

Not only express, but every Node framework has this problem. While there exist plugins and libraries that allow developers to use relational databases in their web applications, they are not very good and usually it's a hassle and more trouble than it's worth to use a relational database with Node and express. See More

Top Pro

Express.js is in the Node.js Foundation Incubator Program

Node.js Foundation Announcement here The Node.js Foundation is a Collaborative Project at The Linux Foundation. Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects are independently funded software projects that harness the power of collaborative development to fuel innovation across industries and ecosystems. See More

Top Pro

Has detailed information

Very simple and fast. See More

Top Pro

Has the largest userbase

It's by far the most popular framework for node. See More

Top Pro

Support for a lot of plugins

Express takes advantage of Node's NPM to distribute and install countless plugins made by third parties which solve almost anything a developer would want to do with Express. See More

Top Pro

Relatively mature

Being a somewhat old Node.js web app framework and being one of the most widely used frameworks, Express.js has matured quite a lot during all that time. It's more stable than its competitors and a huge community backing it. See More

Top Pro

Good Oauth/Facebook integration with connect module

You can easily add oAuth integration/social logins to your next web app without much hassle, using this authentication middleware for connect. See More

Top Pro

Massive ecosystem of middleware

If you have not already checked out the Express.js ecosystem of middleware, you should. See More

See All

score 88 · Answer 2

Go

Top Pro

Performance is on the order of C and Java

Go is blazing fast, but easier to write than Python, JS, Ruby, or many other dynamic languages. See More

Top Con

Expect to write SQL if working with a rdbms

ORMs aren't really mature and reliable in the Go world See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac etc.

Current stable version:1.21.0

Developer:Google with Ken Thompson, Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike

Top Pro

The go compiler compiles binaries instantly — as fast as a scripting language interpreter

Compiled binaries are fast — about as fast in C in most cases. Compiles on every OS without effort — truly cross-platform compiler. As a result of the fast compilation speed, you can use the gorun program to use go source code as if it was a scripting language. See More

Top Con

Designed to make the programmer expendable

Go was designed for large team projects where many contributors may be incompetent. That Go can still get things done under these conditions is a testament to its utility in this niche. Go's infamously weak abstraction power is thus a feature, not a bug, meant to prevent your teammates from doing too much damage. This also means any team member can be easily replaced by another code monkey at minimum cost. Good for the company, bad for you. The more talented programmers, on the other hand, will be very frustrated by having one hand tied behind their back. See More

Top Pro

Exceptionally simple and scalable multithreaded and concurrent programming

Goroutines are "lightweight threads" that runs on OS threads. They provide a simple way for concurrent operations — prepending a function with go will execute it concurrently. It utilizes channels for communication between goroutines which aids to prevent races and makes synchronizing execution effortless across goroutines. The maximum number of OS threads goroutines can run on may be defined at compile time with the GOMAXPROCS variable. See More

Top Con

Hard to abstract even the simplest notions

Go is famously regarded as very simple. However, this simplicity becomes problematic in time. Programmers who use Go find themselves over and over again writing the same thing from a very low point of view. Domains not already served by libraries that are easy to glue are very difficult to get into. See More

Top Pro

Great language for building networking services

Go was started as a systems language but now it has fully committed in the niche of networking services. This has been a brilliant move by Go because it allows them to capitalize on the immense talent of the Go engineering team (who are in the most part network engineers). In a world dominated by Java EE and slow scripting language, Go was a breath of fresh air and it continues to be one of the most powerful languages if you want to build networking services. See More

Top Con

Easy to shadow variable

Due to single character only difference, declare and assign statement can easily shadow variable from outer scope unconsciously. Example: err := nil if xxx { err := somefunctionthatreturnsanerr } return err // always return nil See More

Top Pro

Supports functional programming techniques such as function literals

This naturally also supports first class and high order functions, so you may pass functions as variables to other functions. See More

Top Con

Performance slowdown because of indirect calls and garbage collection

Practically no meaningful Go application can be written without indirect function calls and garbage collection, these are central to Go's core infrastructure. But these are major impediments to achieving good performance. See More

Top Pro

Multiple variables may be assigned on a single line

This conveniently eliminates the need to create temporary variables. Fibonacci example: x, y = y, x+y See More

Top Con

Implementation of interfaces are difficult to figure out

Finding out what interfaces are implemented by a struct requires a magic crystal ball. They are easy to write, but difficult to read and trawl through. See More

Top Pro

Supports splitting source code into multiple files

As long as every source code file in a directory has the same package name, the compiler will automatically concatenate all of the files together during the compilation process. See More

Top Con

No forms designer

Those who are used to Visual Studio may feel the lack of a forms designer for rapid development. See More

Top Pro

Supports 'modules' in the form of packages

Every Go source file contains a package line that indicates which package a file belongs to. If the name of the package is 'main', it indicates that this is a program that will be compiled into a binary. Otherwise, it will recognize that it is a package. See More

Top Pro

Simplified C-like syntax that is as easy to read and write as Python

The language is designed in a manner that seems logical. Syntax is simplified to reduce burden on the programmer and compiler developers. See More

Top Pro

Demonstrates a unique, simple concept to object-oriented programming

All types are essentially objects, be they type aliases or structs. The compiler automatically associates types to their methods at compile time. Those methods are automatically associated to all interfaces that match. This allows you to gain the benefits of multiple inheritance without glue code. As a result of the design, classes are rendered obsolete and the resulting style is easy to comprehend. See More

Top Pro

Built-in unit testing

The idiomatic approach to writing a Go software project is to perform test-driven development with unit testing. Every source code file should have an associated *_test.go file which tests functions in the code. See More

Top Pro

API documentation is rich in content; easy to memorize

Only features deemed critical are added to the language to prevent cruft from working its way into the language. The language is small enough to fit inside one's head without having to repeatedly open documentation. Documentation is hosted on an official webpage in a manner that is simple to read and understand. See More

Top Pro

Programmers don't have to argue over what 10% subet of the language to implement in their software project

The language promotes programming in a specific idiomatic style, which helps keep every programmer on the same page. See More

Top Pro

Easy to install and configure; simple to compile software

Go software can be immediately installed, regardless of your operating system, package manager, or processor architecture with the go get command. Software is compiled statically by default so there is no need to worry about software dependencies on the client system. Makefiles and headers are no longer necessary, as the package system automatically resolves dependencies, downloads source code and compiles via a single command: go build. See More

Top Pro

Syntax for exported code from a package is simplified to be less verbose than other languages

Any variable, type and function whose name begins with a capital letter will be exported by a project, while all other code remains private. There is no longer a need to signify that a piece of code is 'private' or 'public' manually. See More

Top Pro

Great team working behind it

Go has a solid team of engineers working on it (some of the best networking engineers in the world are working on Go). Up until now, the great engineering of the language has compensated for its lack of power. See More

Top Pro

Automatically generates API documentation for installed packages

Godoc is provided to automatically generate API documentation for Go projects. Godoc also hosts its own self-contained web server that will list documentation for all installed packages in your Go path. See More

Top Pro

Provides tools for automatically formatting code for your entire software project

This helps keep every programmer on the same page in a project and eliminates arguments over formatting styles. See More

See All

score 126 · Answer 3

Spring Boot

Top Pro

Inherits all of Spring's strengths

Boot is just a thin configuration layer over Spring Framework, as such it inherits all the strengths of Spring. See More

Top Con

A really big framework

Spring is a really big framework and do more that the common developer want to build applications. The result ? Application size can grow up fast ... See More

VigilantAltjira's Experience

I love Spring Boot. makes Rest API development a breeze. Been using it for 3 years now alongside express and it makes it easier to start a new project over Express where you need to setup everything manually (which can be long and tedious). See More

Specs

Written in:Java

Platforms:Cross-platform

Repository:https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot

Top Pro

Community & Learning resources

One of the the biggests communities you can found and a lot of resources to learn using Spring Framework See More

Top Con

Lacking in UI development

While actually very good and with a very complete and rich feature set to develop and maintain code on the server side, it still doesn't provide any rich framework for building good user interfaces. See More

UnderstandingVanapagan's Experience

enterprise level. very structured and opinionated See More

Top Pro

Preconfigured starters

EagerFascinus's Experience

good See More

Top Pro

Fast prototyping

Spring boot is built for fast prototyping. See More

PoliteKrotos's Experience

I believe that spring boot is the best See More

Top Pro

Kick down to Spring

ReveredPsyche's Experience

TOO MUCH BLOATED , VERBOSE , OVERKILL FOR SMALL PROJECTS See More

See All

score 81 · Answer 4

FastAPI

Top Pro

Dependency injection

It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc. See More

Top Con

Smaller community

Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. But it can grow with time. See More

Ken Kinder's Experience

Probably the fastest/easiest way to get a professional API up and running. I especially enjoy the dependency injection. See More

Specs

Written in:Python

Platforms:Cross-platform

Default ORM:SqlAlchemy

License:MIT

See All Specs

Top Pro

Standards

It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0. See More

EarnestDonbettyr's Experience

Best to create API's for Mobile Applications like Android and IOS. It comes with Batteries like Oauth and Swagger Documentation. See More

Top Pro

Data validation

It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests. See More

ReveredPsyche's Experience

enjoyed working with it for my project See More

Top Pro

High-performance

It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

easy to get started , feature rich , well documented , has python type hints and great performance close to Golang See More

Top Pro

Editor completion

It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere. See More

DelightfulMithra's Experience

great See More

Top Pro

One of the fastest growing communities

Top Pro

Fast is really fast (!)

It's easy to develop API based applications in Python on deadlines for Android and IOS Development. See More

Top Pro

Automatic docs

It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code. See More

Top Pro

Database independent

It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL. See More

Top Pro

Async IO / optional

It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately. See More

Top Pro

World class documentation

It has some of the best documentation of any framework. See More

Top Pro

WebSockets

Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets. See More

Top Pro

OAuth 2.0

It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it. See More

Top Pro

Background tasks

Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette. See More

Top Pro

Supports GraphQL

Python's graphene library is included as an optional dependency meaning that GraphQL API's are supported out of the box, with no additional tweaking needed. See More

See All

score 87 · Answer 5

Laravel

Top Pro

Good for building RESTful APIs

With migrations, powerful and intuitive Eloquent CRUD, resource routing, and simple JSON response out of the box, a complete REST API can be written in hours. See More

Top Con

Steep learning curve

While a lot of times you can write things in plain PHP, it will hinder you down the line when you want to use core features and find that you have to rewrite code which then causes issues throughout the app. Documentation is good, but you need to know what you are looking for and practical examples are non-existent. Many features have been updated throughout the versions in such a short time that tutorials you find online are confusing to sort through outdated tutorials and guides that no longer work or have been depreciated. See More

IntelligentSequana's Experience

Most people say that speed is an issue. That's a misconception. If code is written properly, small compromise in speed can be easily compensated with better infrastructure. Thankfully Laravel Ecosystem is way too strong even in terms of hosting in comparison to others. With forge, any developer can create a production-ready multi-instance high-performance system in few minutes. Laravel Vapor is a game-changer in a server-less hosting solution. Now the real power came from the simplicity of the framework itself. It is so productive that it takes almost half the time to implement the same functionality in comparison to other frameworks like Express.js, Flask, .Net Core or SpringBoot. I have worked on these frameworks, so I can tell you from my experience on multiple products. Even for large enterprise-grade projects, it won't disappoint you. See More

Specs

Written in:PHP

Default ORM: Query Builder

License:MIT License

Default Template Engine:Blade

See All Specs

Top Pro

Good documentation

Laravel's documentation is thorough and very good. It covers everything and is very helpful to experienced and new users alike. See More

Top Con

Very slow

GregariousOkuninushi's Experience

very simple for use and secur See More

Top Pro

Easy to write web apps with authentication

Laravel comes with Authentication capabilities and a fully-powered Auth class out of the box. For passwords it uses bcrypt. See More

Top Con

Bloated

While the speed doesn't seem to be an issue with it (on local tests), in production it may be hindered. The framework creates a ton of files and folders, some of which your app might not even use. Not good if you don't like having a ton of folders and rigid non-standard PHP folder structure for development. See More

Van Sau Bui's Experience

1 years See More

Top Pro

Handles event queuing

Laravel supports event queuing and it does so in a very simple way. To create an event that should be queued just run: php artisan handler:event SendPurchaseConfirmation --event=PodcastWasPurchased --queued This creates a handler that implements the Illuminate\Contracts\Queue\ShouldBeQueued interface. Now when this handler is called it will automatically be queued by the event dispatcher. See More

Top Con

Slow Bootstrap

Laravel has two primary configuration files for it's bootstrapping: https://github.com/laravel/laravel/blob/master/app/Http/Kernel.php https://github.com/laravel/laravel/blob/master/config/app.php The Kernel defines some global middleware that execute on every request, while app.php registers several service providers which go through two booting phases: Registration, which is the first to happen Boot, which is executed after all the other service providers are registered. Another reason why Laravel's bootstrapping is slow is because Laravel sits on top of Symfony's HTTPFoundation, which is relatively heavyweight. See More

FantasticVenilia's Experience

You never go wrong with Laravel. See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn

Top Con

Uses too much magic methods

It complicates debugging and autocompletion. See More

LikableDagda's Experience

Very Good See More

Top Pro

Comes with an excellent built-in ORM

Laravel's Eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. It supports the most popular databases (MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, etc.) out of the box. See More

Top Con

Hard to use model properties

You need to check all model properties in database to know it exists, or declare all them manually. See More

ReveredPsyche's Experience

Not suitable for Enterprise projects See More

Top Pro

Great Ecosystem

For handling JWT Tokens, Authorization, Queues, Cloud based Filesystem See More

Top Con

Follows bad design practices

Uses bad practices, like Singletons, Magic models, Middleware. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

slow as hell See More

Top Pro

Can use Symfony components

Laravel uses many libraries built for the Symfony PHP framework. Many of these libraries are well-built and have been tested by users before. Since the point of using a web framework is to shorten development time and to avoid reinventing the wheel for problems that have already been solved, then it's logical for a framework to use libraries already built to solve problems that have already been solved. See More

Top Pro

Great Community

Top Pro

Comes with its own CLI

Laravel comes out of the box with it's own CLI called Artisan. With Artisan developers can do several different tasks such as migrating databases, seeding databases, clearing the cache and much much more. See More

Top Pro

Gives developers a great degree of freedom in how they set up their project structure

Laravel allows for free configuration and does not force developers to use a single project structure, instead they can change it to how they wish. See More

Top Pro

Extremely powerful template system

Laravel has a powerful template system called Blade. It's quite similar to Twig or Moustache with lots of curly braces but the real power comes from the usage of PHP code directly in the view. Blade templates compile directly to raw PHP and are processed in the server when a request is made. See More

Top Pro

Gulp tasks in the form of Laravel Elixir

In Laravel 5.0 they added Laravel Elixir, which provides an API for using Gulp tasks for Laravel applications. Elixir supports several CSS preprocessors and even some test tools. But it's still in the early stages of development and it will be developed even further in the following releases, with more methods and more Gulp tasks supported. See More

See All

score 81 · Answer 6

Django

Top Pro

Clear and defined MVC organization

Django follows some pretty well established MVC patterns. With everything in place and where requests follow a clear path through urlresolvers, middleware, view and context processors. See More

Top Con

Can feel bloated for small projects

Django's sheer scale and functionality can feel clunky and bloated for small applications. It has too many bells and whistles which can get in the way when developing a small scale application. See More

CapableEtain's Experience

Speed of development is incredible. I can have a brand new project created and configured (DB setup, models, endpoints, routes, deployed live) within an hour. See More

Specs

Written in:Python

Default ORM:Django ORM

Default Template Engine:Django

Multi Language Support:Excellent

See All Specs

Top Pro

ORM support out of the box

Django supports Object-Relational Mapping. With models defined as Python classes which are actually subclasses of Django's django.db.models.Model. Each attribute of the model is then represented as a database field. Queries are lazily executed and Django gives developers an automatically-generated database-access API. See More

Top Con

Lacks on Micro-service Architecture

CapableCastor's Experience

Just easy & simple to Use. See More

Top Pro

Has an admin panel out of the box

Django comes with a highly customizable admin panel and authentication out of the box. This makes the development and production of a simple CMS extremely easy. See More

Top Con

The documentation does not cover real-world scenarios

It is a larger documentation indeed, however is not deep and covers non real problems or even don't show any examples. You'll be better with Google or Stackoverflow See More

ReveredPsyche's Experience

POWERFUL And Batteries included See More

Top Pro

Mature software with many plugins developed over the years

Django was first released in 2005, it has had a lot of time to mature and become better with each release. It also has by far the largest community out of all python frameworks who have continuously over the years built and maintained many powerful plugins. See More

Top Con

Takes a lot of time to learn for beginners

Top Pro

Simple database management

Just a few lines of code can instruct Django to create all the tables and fields required in your database automatically. Schemas are managed with "migrations", that are also created automatically, and can be rolled out from your development box and implemented on production systems with just a single command. This performs any database changes required, from table creation, indexes, renaming fields, and pre-populating initial data. Each migration builds on the previous migrations, so you can trace the evolution of your data and even recreate the layout of your database at any point in the lifecycle of your application. See More

Top Con

Routing requires some knowledge of regular expressions

Given a GET request for /topics/426/viewpoints/1/sections/create, how does Django decide which bit of Python code is invoked to handle it? It compares the request path to your giant pile of regular expressions. And then if there's some other regular expression starts matching /top and all your requests for /topics/ start going there, good luck figuring out why. You won't be informed of any conflict until you notice you seem to be getting the wrong pages back. The structure of URL paths is almost universally hierarchal. There is no call to have anything as ridiculously flexible (and notoriously hard-to-read) as regular expressions to organize request routing. See More

Top Pro

ASGI

Now supports ASGI. See More

Top Con

Template errors fail silently by default

If you make a typo in a template variable, or change a view so that variable is no longer passed to the template, you won't get an error message pointing out that something has gone wrong. That reference will just be treated as if it is an empty string instead. There is a way to configure this, but since so many templates have been written assuming this behavior, nobody ever enables template errors because it would break so much of the existing support tools (e.g. the built-in admin interface). See More

Top Pro

Not good for I/O intensive Tasks

FastApi or Tornado may be better in that regard. See More

Top Pro

Developing a simple prototype can be very fast

Django's philosophy of batteries included means that experienced developers won't have to plan too much ahead on what kind of application infrastructure they need and instead just start developing web applications quickly. See More

Top Con

Can't use ASGI natively

After adding ASGI support from ver 3.0, ASGI server wraps around WSGI ones. See More

Top Pro

Highly customizable

Django is in itself a highly customizable web framework. The database, template framework and ORM can all be swapped out. See More

See All

score 80 · Answer 7

Flask

Top Pro

Very flexible

The choice of not having an ORM, but instead choosing one suited to the task, gives developers who use Flask a great deal of flexibility. Another area where Flask gives a lot of options to developers is the templating. They can use Jinja2, Flask's default templating language or choose from a number of different templating languages they desire. See More

Top Con

Not async-friendly

Flask is explicitly not designed to handle async programming. See More

Ray's Experience

I really like Flask for REST APIs when used in conjunction with marshmallow for validation and serializing/de-serializing to/from JSON. Routing is easy, and Flask's blueprints provides a neat way for keeping resources namespaced with its own URL prefix. While I had to spend some time coming up with a project structure that is modular and comfortable to work with specifically for APIs, the time investment paid off because everything became really straightforward — with this combination, I can implement an username/password signup endpoint in ~15 LOC. See More

Specs

Written in:Python

License:BSD License

Top Pro

Minimalist without losing power

Flask is very easy to get up and going, with vanilla HTML or with bootstrap pieces. It doesn't take much lines of python to load Flask to get headers working, etc, and since it's all modular you don't have to have something you don't want in your application. Each module within Flask works very well, and is extremely good on bandwidth and CPU usage. See More

Top Con

Slow on adding new features

CalmTaranis's Experience

Flask is easy to use and itself having Python as the language makes it more easier to write codes. Debugging is fun there ! See More

Top Pro

Extremely easy to build a quick prototype

Even though it's pretty minimalistic out of the box, Flask still provides the necessary tools to build a quick prototype for a web app right after a fresh install. With all the main components pretty much packed in the flask package, building a simple web app in a single Python file is as easy as it gets. See More

Top Con

Aged syntax

Charles Nascimento's Experience

I've used flask for small-medium sized APIs and the experience was great! The development is quickly and easy, but there aren't too many tools to work with See More

Top Pro

Clear

It's a very clear API, easy to use and deploy, you can use it with gunicorn easily. See More

Top Con

Too dependent on third-party packages

It wastes time to search and find which library is better and safe. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

slow , looking old compare to new ASGI frameworks like FastApI and starlette See More

Top Pro

Able to use ORM or "true SQL"

Top Con

HTML-oriented, not API-oriented

Not necessarily designed for making APIs, though that is possible See More

Top Pro

Lots of resources available online

Flask is one of the most popular Python web frameworks, if not the most popular one. As such, there's plenty of guides, tutorials, and libraries available for it. A large number of important Python libraries, such as SQLAlchemy have libraries for Flask, which add valuable bindings to make the development process and the integration between these libraries and Flask as easy as possible. See More

Top Con

Setting up a large project requires some previous knowledge of the framework

Setting up a large project with Flask is not that easy considering how there's no "official" way of doing it. Blueprints are a useful tool in this regard but require some additional reading and are a bit tricky to get right for a beginner. The lack of some defaults can also be problematic. Having to choose between different libraries for a certain task is never easy, especially if you have never worked with Flask before. See More

Top Pro

Great documentation

The official documentation is very thorough and complete. Everything is explained in-depth and followed by extremely well-explained tutorials that tackle real-world problems. See More

Top Con

Not efficient for I/O Bound Task

While it is faster than django, it lacks on Async Tasks. FastApi or aiohttp work better. See More

Top Con

Threadlocals and globals used everywhere

The default way of creating applications in flask makes it hard to use reusable and clean code. See More

See All

score 40 · Answer 8

Phoenix

Top Pro

Will be easy to learn for Rails developers

Top Con

Deployment to production can be tricky

More complicated than some other frameworks and often the deployment details listed in the documentation fail to work as described. Hot reload functionality can be pain to setup. See More

ReveredPsyche's Experience

not good as its hypes See More

Specs

Written in:Elixir

Platforms:Linux, Windows

Top Pro

Easy to learn

The official guides are really well written. See More

Top Con

Third party libraries can be limited

Community is not yet fully mature meaning some fairly basic libraries are either not ready or require significant effort to get up and running. This can be mitigated by using JavaScript libraries in some cases, you often lose benefits of the Elixir base when doing this. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

Community not defined See More

Top Pro

Relatively big community

It has the biggest community from all Elixir web frameworks so there are examples and tutorials all over the place and you can quickly find help. See More

Top Con

Per page JavaScript and CSS loading requires custom code

By default all JavaScript and CSS is compiled into one file which is loaded on every single page, which is not good for larger projects. No simple way to fix this without writing custom handling code. See More

Top Pro

Simple and clean

Very little clutter and once you get used to it the conceptual underpinning is elegant and highly intutive. See More

Top Con

Connection handling speed isn't everything

While the erlang base -- the fact it's based on a derivation of a language written for a telecommunications network -- allows it to handle connections well, this isn't everything. As there are not yet any large-scale apps using Phoenix it is unclear how things like database management will fare at enterprise level. Not necessarily a criticism, but one to watch. Though Dischord either does or did previous use Elixir for at least part of its codebase. See More

Top Pro

Very quick web server

Absolutely trounces the competition on pageload time with default settings, even from behind an nginx reverse proxy. See More

Top Con

Community not defined

Top Pro

Complete full stack solution

Doesn’t require additional installations for full stack development. Works out of the box. See More

Top Con

too much functional

Top Pro

Very good at parallel processing

Because it's based on Erlang VMs, processes scale exceptionally well on multi-core, multi-threaded CPUs. See More

Top Con

Poor documentation

Top Pro

Handles up to 2 million user connections per server

While this is in a test scenario with a powerful server, this demonstrates Phoenix's unparallelled ability to scale potentially massively reducing hardware costs. See More

Top Pro

Very positive reviews

See All

score 80 · Answer 9

ASP.NET Core

Top Pro

Fast and getting faster

Top Con

Encapsulated Microsoft environment

RickZeeland's Experience

With ASP.NET Core you can build web apps, web services, IoT apps, and mobile backends. It can be used with Visual Studio, or with Visual Studio Code. See More

Specs

Written in:C#

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac, Docker

Default ORM:Entity Framework

WEB SERVER:Kestrel

See All Specs

Top Pro

Multi-platform

Can run on Windows, Linux and Mac (also Visual Studio Code editor). See More

Top Con

Unnecessarily complex

Performing basic implementations requires excessive boilerplate code. Some key stacks are poorly implemented (System.Text.Json) and do not offer enough features. See More

ConsiderateKunapipi's Experience

Not as good IDE support on linux See More

Top Pro

Great developer experience

Tooling is excellent. All can be done within Visual Studio; coding, testing, debugging, version control, deployment, etc. See More

Top Con

Being fast isn't enough when it's hard to develop on it

DreamerOkuninushi's Experience

Great if you prefer OOP, makes it easy to structure your application. Has mature package repo (NuGet). EF Core, the ORM from Microsoft is great IMO and C# is a joy to work with. Would recommend for medium to big applications, not sure if I would recommend for microservice architecture, but haven't tried. See More

Top Pro

Built-in middleware

Built-in middleware featuring: Authentication, Cookie policy, Health Check, MVC, Session etc. See More

CourageousPistis's Experience

I think it is nice platform and hope it keeps going better and better. See More

Top Pro

Hosting

Ability to host on IIS, Nginx, Apache, Docker, or self-host in your own process. Also in the cloud with Azure. See More

PoliteEuryale's Experience

The fastest way to build your API. Visual Studio Code its just perfect to code it! See More

Top Pro

Managed dependency injection

Register your service layers at startup and automatically receive them in your constructor. See More

DazzlingAsherah's Experience

People underestimate the power of a OO programming language See More

Top Pro

Ease of use

OptimisticTelesphorus's Experience

For me i was .net framework guy. So for me , i adopt it so fast. It's really great for me. See More

Top Pro

Tooling

Both VS and VSCode are powerful free IDEs that are well integrated with ASP.net Core. VS Community also allows for commercial use for projects with less than 5 developers. See More

ReveredPsyche's Experience

overkill for a Normal project See More

Top Pro

Security

It is a very secure platform. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

encapsulated Microsoft Environment See More

Top Pro

JSON optimization

In .NET Core 2.1 and 3.0, new APIs are added that make it possible to write JSON APIs that require less memory, using Span<T> and UTF8 strings, and improve throughput of applications like Kestrel, ASP.NET Core web server. See also Utf8JsonReader. See More

Top Pro

Built in Dependency Injection

Where in the old ASP.NET we had to rely on 3rd-party solutions, Dependency Injection is now built in. Read Implementing an Effective Architecture for ASP.NET Core Web API. See More

Top Pro

Multi platform

Can run on Windows, Linux and Mac (also Visual Studio Code editor). See More

Top Pro

Tutorials and documentation quality

Both microsoft and 3rd party tutorials are mostly of high quality and encourage you to use the industry best-practices. See More

Top Pro

Open Source

It is open source solution. See More

Top Pro

No encapsulated environment

In .net framework 3.1, you can deploy the app in any platform whitout having to install the framework itself (self-contained app). See More

Top Pro

NSwag

NSwag can be used to automatically generate code. See More

See All

score 17 · Answer 10

Lumen

Top Pro

Easy to use

Top Con

It's based off Laravel and inherits its shortcomings

Lumen inherits many shortcomings of Laravel, such as static proxy classes. See More

SophisticatedPolybotes's Experience

Light version of Laravel, very easy to use See More

Specs

PHP version:7.1.3

Top Pro

Highest performing PHP micro-Framework

Lumen is benchmarked at 100/rps (Requests Per Second) faster than Slim v3, which used to be considered the fastest and most performant micro-Framework to date with the ability to handle 1800/rps. (1900/rps vs 1800/rps respectively). See More

Top Con

Lacks in documentation compared to Laravel

PleasantDogoda's Experience

poor documents , poor community too See More

Top Pro

Feature rich

Top Con

Built for smaller tasks like APIs

Top Pro

Easily upgradable to Laravel

Since it's basically just a minimal version of Laravel, it can be upgraded to a full Laravel app if the need arises. No need for code changes, just import the code to a new Laravel install. See More

Top Con

Made to work alongside Laravel

Lumen as a framework is at it's full potential when used alongside it's older brother. Lumen was created to be used for microservices alongside Laravel, which is used for more user-facing applications. If a project is already using another framework other than Laravel, it would be better to use another microframework for microservices instead of Lumen. See More

Top Con

poor community

poor community See More

See All

score 37 · Answer 11

Ruby on Rails

Top Pro

Very good for automated testing

Build around TDD and BDD, Rails impliments test driven design in a way that is fully integrated with the framework. Excellent testing libraries, such as RSpec. See More

Top Con

Popularity decreasing

EmpatheticMimas's Experience

it is cool for api development See More

Specs

Written in:Ruby

Default ORM:ActiveRecord

Default Template Engine:ERB

Default Test Engine:RSpec & Cucumber

Top Pro

Good conventions

MVC is a great starting point, and perfect for APIs. You'll rarely if ever have to wonder "where should I put this code?" See More

Top Con

Not a very popular language outside of web development

ReveredPsyche's Experience

not good as before See More

Top Pro

Meta-programming capabilities

Top Con

Bad performance

Among the slowest frameworks. If you want to scale, you will have to migrate to another land. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

aged and slow Framework See More

Top Pro

Ruby is a nice readable language

Ruby has a very clean syntax that makes code easier to both read and write than more traditional Object Oriented languages, such as Java. For beginning programmers, this means the focus is on the meaning of the program, where it should be, rather than trying to figure out the meaning of obscure characters. presidents = ["Ford", "Carter", "Reagan", "Bush1", "Clinton", "Bush2"] for ss in 0...presidents.length print ss, ": ", presidents[presidents.length - ss - 1], "\n"; end See More

Top Con

Learning curve seems low at first, but starts becoming steeper

Rails' simplicity is deceptive. It's learning curve is really low at first, and the huge number of tutorials and guides out there for starting with Rails make it even easier. But it starts getting harder and harder as apps become more complicated. If good code conventions and OO design are not followed, then the codebase will be all over the place and it becomes impossible to maintain it. See More

Top Pro

Many plugins (gems) available

There are many third-party plugins (Ruby gems) available for Rails development. The larger ones and those that have a lot of downloads and users are very well documented and easy to use. See More

Top Con

Too much convention

Top Pro

Massive community with lots of tutorials and guides

The sheer scale and massive number of developers using Rails has produced a large number of guides, tutorials, plugins, documentation, videos and anything that can help new and old Rails developers. See More

Top Con

Somewhat outdated

Slow and clunky compared to more modern frameworks. Likely to quietly disappear and be replaced by alternatives already emerging that offer all the advantages with few of the drawbacks. See More

Top Pro

Small projects are very easy and it's possible to finish one in very little time

The large number of documentation, tutorials, videos and guides which help new developers who are just starting with Rails make it seem very easy to create a small and simple application by relying on code generation and components that come out of the box with Rails. See More

Top Con

Too much magic

So much behavior is implemented with dynamic behind-the-scenes changes to existing classes that obscure bugs are way too common. Conflicting interactions between multiple plugins that both try to change the same objects are a particularly pernicious example. See More

Top Pro

Supported on every major cloud or VPS hosting service

Rails is supported on every major Cloud hosting service nowadays. There are also countless tutorials that help developers deploy their Rails apps if there are any problems on the way. See More

Top Pro

Cool language

See All

score 14 · Answer 12

Slim

Top Pro

Powerful and easy-to-use

Slim is very easy to learn. You can use Eloquent ORM or try others. Most importantly, you can use only the libraries that you need. Ideal for making a REST API. See More

Top Con

Too minimal

While it's true that Slim is a microframework, it's still too minimal. When used for throwaway projects or simple prototypes, it's perfect. But in the long run, it becomes less and less useful and you end up in implementing a fully custom framework in trying to tackle all the missing features. So in the end, if the project would go further than a prototyping stage it would be easier to just implement another microframework that has those missing features out of the box. See More

PassionateWongTaiSin's Experience

Extremely easy to learn, flexible and lightweight. See More

Specs

Written in:PHP

License:GPL 2

Top Pro

Flexible

Slim doesn't demand that you stick to a fixed folder structure. As long as you load Slim the right way you can do anything from there the way you like it. See More

Top Con

Very little consistency among different versions

There have been quite some changes that break the compatibility between Slim 2 and Slim 3. Even if you learned how to work with the Slim 2, you will find that Slim 3 requires re-training. See More

PleasantDogoda's Experience

community doesn't exist at all See More

Top Pro

Extremely customizable

You can add any dependency, package or class that you want to use as a contained dependency. See More

Top Con

Dependency injection is too weak

It is not really dependency injection, but just a configurable container. See More

Top Pro

A good starting point

Slim is minimal and that is a good thing if you want to start from there. It can be easily extended and even supports popular packages that are used in Laravel (like Illuminate\Database (eloquent)) for example. See More

Top Con

Needs strong bases to create dependencies

The dependency container schema of Slim is one of the biggest PROS and CONS of the framework. It is true that this schema brings so much flexibility to add anything, but another thing that is true is that you need to have strong bases of patterns, and an extensive knowledge of your libraries to convert it into a Slim dependency. See More

Top Pro

Open source

The Slim Framework is open source and is released under the MIT public license See More

Top Con

tools are scarce

Top Pro

Extremely lightweight

Paired with swoole it's a micro service powerhouse. See More

Top Pro

REST based

REST fans will love the REST based architecture. See More

Top Pro

Supports tie-ins for Rack-like middleware

Rack is an interface used in Ruby frameworks used to group and order modules, which most of the time are Ruby classes, and specify between them. Slim uses a simple concept for it's middleware. By wrapping HTTP requests and responses it unifies the middleware into a single method call. See More

Top Pro

Useful classes

Contains classes for managing requests, responses, cookies, logging, views, HTTP caching, and more. See More

Top Pro

Well organized and thorough documentation

Slim's documentation is well organized and detailed, every concept is thoroughly explained and it is very helpful for both advanced users and beginners. See More

See All

score 9 · Answer 13

Loopback

Top Pro

Easy to get a project up and running

Easily and quickly get going. See More

score 10 · Answer 14

Adonisjs

Top Pro

Based on Laravel PHP Framework

If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis. See More

Top Con

No NOSQL integration

Only used ORM, not ODM. See More

Specs

Language:JavaScript

Top Pro

Option for full-stack or api standalone implementation

You can choose to use the full-stack version or if you wish to build a RESTful API you can choose to use the api standalone version. See More

Top Pro

Has websocket support out of the box

Top Pro

Option for full-stack or API standalone implementation

You can choose to use the full-stack version or if you wish to build a RESTful API you can choose to use the api standalone version. See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn, especially if you're already familiar with Laravel

Top Pro

Very good documentation

Top Pro

Built-in modules for everything

There are built-in modules for everything: Auth, Social Auth, mailing, etc. See More

Top Pro

Similar to Rails

See All

score 9 · Answer 15

Yii

Top Pro

Highly extensible without effort

Top Con

Can be hard for beginners

Since Yii requires developers to write code following certain rules, or in other words, it requires developers to follow the "Yii way of doing things" it can be hard for beginners to warm up to it and start using it right away. See More

Specs

Default ORM:Yii Active Record

Default Template Engine:Twig

PHP version:5.4+

Top Pro

Comes with important security standarts

Since security is a crucial part of any application, Yii comes with great security features out of the box to help developers create a secure and reliable application. These security features contain but are not restricted to: Input validation Output filtering Features against SQL injection Cross-site scripting prevention See More

Top Pro

Rapid development through code scaffolding

Yii takes care of repetitive tasks through Gii, a web-based scaffolding tool. Gii takes care of code generation and creating code templates for: Models Controllers Forms Modules Extensions CRUD controller actions and views There are a lot of scaffolding templates made by community for Gii, that improve generated code functionality by a lot. Gii is very easy to extend yourself. See More

Top Pro

Integrated with a testing framework

Yii makes use of Codeception, a great PHP testing framework that helps developers run their tests. They can be unit, functional or acceptance tests since Codeception supports them all. See More

Top Pro

Easy to install

Yii uses Composer to handle it's dependency installation. This is rather easy and not very time consuming, although it should be noted that Composer is very resource-intensive considering what it's job is. But that is not really Yii's fault. See More

Top Pro

Best framework for CRUD operation

Yii Framework Provides most of features require for crud functionalities like GridView, Listview and DetailView (with jquery search and validation functions) by generating using GII. See More

Top Pro

Lots of plugins available

Yii has about 2000 addons hosted on Yii's official website. These addons significantly decrease development time and increase the developer's efficiency. See More

Top Pro

Highly extensible

Yii is built to be extremely extensible. Virtually every component of the framework can be extended programmatically. For example, if you want to add a unique id to your views, it's very easy to do: namespace app\components; class View extends yii\web\View { public $bodyId; /* Yii allows you to add magic getter methods by prefacing method names with "get" */ public function getBodyIdAttribute() { return ($this->bodyId != '') ? 'id="' . $this->bodyId . '"' : ''; } } See More

Top Pro

Strong community support

Yii has a strong and rather large community behind it. This is proven by the great number of blog posts, tutorials, guides and reviews on the Yii framework as well as the great number of extensions developed for it. See More

Top Pro

License

Yii is free and open source and is distributed under the BSD License. See More

See All

score 10 · Answer 16

Symfony

Top Pro

Uses Doctrine ORM

Symfony makes use of the Doctrine ORM to add an abstraction layer over the database in order to maintain flexibility without having unnecessary code duplication. See More

Top Con

Not really built for providing just an API backend

PerfectAine's Experience

API Platform does a lot out of the box, but it can also be customized. See More

Specs

Written in:PHP

Default ORM:Doctrine

License:MIT License

Default Template Engine:Twig

See All Specs

Top Pro

Highly active community

Symfony has one of the most active communities out of all the PHP frameworks. This is shown by the high number of commits made every day in the GitHub repo. See More

Top Con

Very hard to install

Setting it up on webhost without a console is difficult. See More

Top Pro

Open source

Symfony is open source and released under the MIT license. See More

Top Pro

Uses YAML/XML/PHP/Annotation

Symfony makes use of XML, YAML or PHP annotations to create configurations in order to tell Doctrine on how properties of a certain class should be. See More

Top Pro

Powerful event system

Symfony has a powerful built-in event system that allows you to add flexibility to applications and makes it easier to maintain the codebase down the road. See More

Top Pro

Teaches you good practices

Symfony makes you be a better programmer. You have to deal with the latest object-oriented design patterns such as service-oriented architecture, dependency injection, interface abstraction, and so on. See More

Top Pro

Easy debugging with a built-in debug toolbar

Symfony comes with a built-in toolbar that helps developers debug their applications during the development phase. The toolbar is also extendable and new components, called panels can be added if needed to help with the debugging process. See More

Top Pro

Great plugin ecosystem

One of the greatest strengths of Symfony is it's amazing and large plugin ecosystem, which comes as a result of it's large and dedicated community. Having a large number of plugins means less development time and more productivity. See More

Top Pro

Great templating engine

Uses Twig, which is a simple and easy to learn templating language that can also be used as a standalone engine, outside the framework. See More

See All

score 5 · Answer 17

Sinatra

Top Con

Hard to scale well

Because it's rather small and minimalistic, scaling up is not very easy with Sinatra. You need a great deal of knowledge on libraries and modules that may be useful for your particular use-case. As your application grows larger it may be hard to keep things clean and minimalistic, losing a lot of the advantages that Sinatra has. See More

Top Pro

Nice DSL

Top Pro

Has only the bare minimum needed

Sinatra has taken an approach of having only the most useful components needed to build applications out of the box. It has simple routes along with a Domain Specific Language over a Rack layer. See More

Top Pro

Small loading time

Since it has very few dependencies, the loading time for a Sinatra app is considerably small. See More

See All

score 7 · Answer 18

Play! Framework

Top Pro

Readable code

Play framework's convention over configuration methodology makes most Play projects have a very similar structure. This means that the code written for the framework is very readable. This enables a developer to switch between applications without having to relearn the ecosystem for every project. The built-in templating system also helps with code and makes it possible to have a very low count of lines of code. See More

Top Con

Verbose

PleasantDogoda's Experience

its overkill for a simple rest API See More

Top Pro

Develop with scala and/or java

Since scala runs on the JVM, both languages may be used interchangeably. This gives opportunity to use the new functional/oo language Scala. See More

Top Con

Hard to Learn

Top Pro

Play is an extensive ecosystem

Play uses Akka for concurrency, Scala for a templating engine, Netty as a client-server framework and SBT (Simple Build Tool) for building. And they all come out of the box. Play also comes with the option to scaffold your applications. Play is an all-embracing ecosystem designed to increase developer productivity and shorten development times. See More

Top Con

Not as many resources to learn

Other languages and frameworks have countless tutorials, books, moocs, etc. Java and Play does not have nearly as much. See More

Top Pro

Good documentation and a great community

Play has quite a large community which provides numerous tutorials and videos related to developing with Play. The Play official documentation covers many things, such as the framework itself but also specific stuff such as Akka, SBT and Netty. There are also many big companies that base their main sites around Play, one of them is LinkedIn which provides third-party documentation on a regular basis. See More

Top Con

Backward incompatibility

The jump from Play 1 to Play 2.x caused a lot of confusion. While it is important to have some kind of evolution, sometimes it causes backward incompatibility which can create some problems. It makes tutorials or modules made for the old version obsolete. This can make it hard for beginners to find useful resources. The template engine which used Groovy now uses Scala. See More

Top Pro

Simple for beginners

Play is very simple to get started. The documentation is very helpful for beginners and advanced users alike and the official website has a great "Getting Started" tutorial to begin developing with Play. See More

Top Pro

Actively supported and developed by Typesafe

Top Pro

Use Akka to scale across multiple servers

See All

score 4 · Answer 19

37 Options Considered

My Recommendation for Express.js

My Recommendation for Express.js

Can make use of a great number of plugins

you need to learn new trending things every day

Easy to learn for people who have a little experience in backend dev

No single recommended way of doing something

Massive ecosystem of Middleware

Messed up JavaScript ecosystem

Great routing API

Not great for data science

Lightweight

Not good as its hypes

Good documentation

NPM hurts more than it helps

Setting up is very easy

Hard to control big projects

Great for beginner Node.js programmers

Doesn't support HTTP2

Great supportive community

Working with relational databases can be a hassle

Express.js is in the Node.js Foundation Incubator Program

Has detailed information

Has the largest userbase

Support for a lot of plugins

Relatively mature

Good Oauth/Facebook integration with connect module

Massive ecosystem of middleware

My Recommendation for Go

My Recommendation for Go

Performance is on the order of C and Java

Expect to write SQL if working with a rdbms

The go compiler compiles binaries instantly — as fast as a scripting language interpreter

Designed to make the programmer expendable

Exceptionally simple and scalable multithreaded and concurrent programming

Hard to abstract even the simplest notions

Great language for building networking services

Easy to shadow variable

Supports functional programming techniques such as function literals

Performance slowdown because of indirect calls and garbage collection

Multiple variables may be assigned on a single line

Implementation of interfaces are difficult to figure out

Supports splitting source code into multiple files

No forms designer

Supports 'modules' in the form of packages

Simplified C-like syntax that is as easy to read and write as Python

Demonstrates a unique, simple concept to object-oriented programming

Built-in unit testing

API documentation is rich in content; easy to memorize

Programmers don't have to argue over what 10% subet of the language to implement in their software project

Easy to install and configure; simple to compile software

Syntax for exported code from a package is simplified to be less verbose than other languages

Great team working behind it

Automatically generates API documentation for installed packages

Provides tools for automatically formatting code for your entire software project

My Recommendation for Spring Boot

My Recommendation for Spring Boot

Inherits all of Spring's strengths

A really big framework

Community & Learning resources

Lacking in UI development

Preconfigured starters

Fast prototyping

Kick down to Spring

My Recommendation for FastAPI

My Recommendation for FastAPI

Dependency injection

Smaller community

Standards

Data validation

High-performance

Editor completion

One of the fastest growing communities

Fast is really fast (!)

Automatic docs

Database independent

Async IO / optional

World class documentation

WebSockets

OAuth 2.0