Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
Development
Linux
OSX
What are the best Bash replacements?
19
Options
Considered
367
User
Recs.
Oct 21, 2023
Last
Updated
Related Questions
Activity
Have feedback or ideas?
Join our community
on Discord
Ad
15
Options
Considered
Best Bash replacements
Price
Included plugins
Bare load time
83
zsh
-
-
-
59
fish
-
-
-
--
Xonsh
-
-
-
--
DASH
-
-
-
--
rc
-
-
-
See Full List
83
zsh
My Rec
ommendation
for
zsh
My Recommendation for
zsh
All
17
Experiences
3
Pros
11
Cons
3
Top
Con
•••
Not fully compatible with bash
There is a small chance you may have a bash script that doesn't work in zsh, although this is very very rare and most developers will never run into any issues.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Interactive autocompletion
When you start typing a command, you can press the tab key and it will complete the command you started typing. If there are multiple potential commands, you can choose which one to run by simply pressing tab again. Case-insensitive by default, too.
See More
Elias Van Ootegem's Experience
Most people have some custom bash scripts, or aliases. The vast majority of these will work out of the box with zsh. Apart from some nice touches, like shared history, nice tab completion, globbing, and PS{1,4} being easier to customise, zsh will feel really familiar. There's a couple of config frameworks out and about for you to use, so it's probably the fastest bash alternative to set up, and get used to. Now saying it's the best replacement because it's pretty much the same is a bit of a poor argument. If nothing else, it'll become obvious that zsh is fast. If you spend some time configuring it, you'll find that some of it features are vastly more superior to bash's counterparts (eg spell check)
See More
Top
Con
•••
Requires a lot of configuration to be used fully
Zsh requires a lot of tinkering with configuration files and downloading plugins in order to be able to do tasks which other shells may be able to do out of the box.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Powerful community-driven tools via oh-my-zsh
Oh-my-zsh is a community-driven framework, which helps users with their zsh configuration and plugins. 400 plugins, 200+ themes and auto-updates to always be up to date.
See More
Peter J. Mello's Experience
Once you've used zsh, bash feels like riding a bicycle after you get your drivers' license.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Defaults are unfriendly for a long-time bash user
Expect to find a configuration you like (or use the configuration utility) to set reasonable preferences. Default zsh interaction is different enough to make you stutter through what used to be familiar workflows.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Autocomplete for options
Zsh intelligently determines if you are trying to complete a file path or an option, and pressing tab after typing - will reliably bring up a list of options.
See More
Allan Daemon's Experience
Hard to beginning to use but very powerful. Things like global aliases, cd old_top_dir new_top_dir, and other goodies.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Good bash compatibility
Things you've learned using bash will largely apply to zsh. Scripts written in bash will run with little to no modification.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Safer variable behaviour
Unlike Bash, zsh does not split unquoted variables by default, making it less error-prone.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Recursive globbing
ls **/*.log for example is supported by ZSH.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Great install procedure
Zsh will take you through a procedure which is roughly 30 minutes in length before during install. Through this procedure it asks you to set different options and customize the shell the way you want it to. Most of these settings are also found in other shells, but to customize them you have to go dig configuration files while zsh allows you to do it in the beginning.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Shared histories
If you spend a lot of time in the terminal, most likely you will have several terminal windows open. Zsh has great support for command line histories. The history is unique and shared through all the different instances.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Smart escaping
Zsh can determine the context of the command you're typing in and determine if it should escape characters if you're typing in a URI.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Pipe output to a temporary file:
Some programs don't support loading from stdin, but ZSH can store outputs to a temporary file, example: unzip =(curl http://example.com/someZipFile.zip)
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Faster spelling correction
Zsh' s correct (or correctall) is vastly superior to Bash's attempt at spelling correction.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
146
6
59
fish
My Rec
ommendation
for
fish
My Recommendation for
fish
All
33
Experiences
2
Pros
23
Cons
8
Top
Pro
•••
Friendlier scripting syntax
No more trying to remember what arcane sequence of punctuation to use in a case statement.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Incompatible with POSIX
This means that any script or command you copy with && in it instead of ; and (among other things), will not work.
See More
v3ree's Experience
It works out of the box, not much configuration needed. Autocompletion is awesome - it even builds it from man pages. Great ncurses feedback and interaction! The scripting language is much more readable than POSIX. Better than bash for day-to-day use and for learning to use the CLI.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Autosuggestions
Via their site "fish suggests commands as you type based on history and completions."
See More
Top
Con
•••
Incompatible with software that assumes everyone runs bash
See More
FantasticMokhNaana's Experience
Annoying to set up as system default shell. But worth it!
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Fuzzy autocomplete
Commands, files, and directories can all be fuzzily complete with TAB.
See More
Top
Con
•••
No undo support
There is no included undo feature currently.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Syntax highlighting
Things like commands, their arguments, strings and control syntax are colored separately and the colors themselves are configurable.
See More
Top
Con
•••
No support for opening files (`exec 3>/some/file`)
All shells let you open a file and keep a file descriptor. Except Fish.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Already set up for you
While other shells require a lot of set up to act the way you want them to and to have some useful features, fish works perfectly out of the box. It has all the most widely used features baked in and are there out of the box without having the need to install plugins or tweak any configuration files.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Very slow
Much of the functionality in Fish was not written with performance in mind.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Graphical configuration UI
Selecting syntax colors, prompt themes, and available fish functions can all be performed through a web-based graphical interface.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Doesn't support history expansion ("!!")
Fish has no support for !!, but you can use Oh My Fish shell framework and install bang-bang plugin to have this shortcut in Fish shell. The downside of using bang-bang is that it takes over ones default key bindings, for those that don't use them it should not be an issue but for those that do it is an annoyance to be considered. For sudo !!, this can also be achieved by making this custom function: function sudo if test "$argv" = !! eval command sudo $history[1] else command sudo $argv end end
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Universal variables
You can define Universal variables, which are shared instantaneously through all running fish sessions and persists through shell restarts.
See More
Top
Con
•••
No support for sudo !!
Fish has no support for sudo !!, but you can use Oh My Fish shell framework and install bang-bang plugin to have this shortcut in Fish shell. This can also be achieved by making this custom function: function sudo if test "$argv" = !! eval command sudo $history[1] else command sudo $argv end end
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Large collection of command completions built-in
Most standard UNIX tools and command-line programs have extensive completions shipped with fish by default.
See More
Top
Con
•••
oh-my-zsh makes the shell slow
See More
Top
Pro
•••
High portability
Because it needs very little configuration to work properly, you can use Fish everywhere. If you are working on a system you don't usually work, installing Fish from the repository is easy and will give you the same experience as the installation on your own machine without having to drag a dotfile around.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Fisherman - a fast, modern plugin manager
Large test coverage, micro-second shell start, compatibility with plugins from other existing frameworks such as Tackle, Oh My Fish and Wahoo, cache system, offline index, the Fishery and other features.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Incompatible with POSIX
This is a pro, not a con. The developers break with a lot of cruft, and while some may miss zsh-style familiarity, fish was the only shell you can consistently install across different computers (even a Mac).
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Excellent documentation
It has a great tutorial. And the official documentation is clear, full of eloquent examples, and to the point.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Auto suggestions
Fish suggests commands as you type, based on command history, completions, and valid file paths. As you type commands, you will see a completion offered after the cursor, in a muted gray color (which can be changed with the fish_color_autosuggestion variable).
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Creates completion files from manual pages
Fish_update_completions parses manual pages installed on the system, and attempts to create completion files in the fish configuration directory.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Interactive searchable history
Fish has by far the best way to work with history, everything is automatically searchable. It works in the way you expect. No learning required.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Configuration framework for fish shell
The fish community maintains Oh My Fish, which is a shell framework inspired on Oh My Zsh awesome design and name. It offers a lot of beautiful prompt themes and awesome plugins, is lightweight, awesome and very simple to use.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Pretty usable even without plugins
Everything you need from oh-my-zsh is available on default fish, don't need to install any plugins. And even better, fish is smaller than zsh.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
oh-my-fish
Like oh-my-zsh but for fish shell, though arguably less robust.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Intuitive shell expansion in "for" loops
Unlike bash, this won't return you string *.sh if no .sh files are found for filename in *.sh echo "$filename" end
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Adding, removing and editing aliases is extremely easy
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Less ambiguent lists
Here is a sample. Notice that there are 2 files with spaces in names. ls produces a valid list, and for loop correctly iterated through its values. ➤ for a in (ls); ls -l $a; end -rw-rw-r-- 1 sashka sashka 0 Apr 19 03:16 alma mater.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 sashka sashka 0 Apr 19 03:16 whatever i want.txt sh scripts tend to be fragile when there are lists containing values with spaces. Also: ➤ echo $PATH /usr/bin /bin /usr/sbin /sbin /usr/local/bin ➤ echo $PATH[1] /usr/bin ➤ echo $PATH[-1] /usr/local/bin
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Auto indentation when creating functions
When writing functions in an interactive shell, it will auto-indent as needed for if, for, function, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Fisherman ⚑ A fast, modern plugin manager for fish
Large test coverage, micro-second shell start, compatibility with plugins from other existing frameworks such as Tackle, Oh My Fish and Wahoo, cache system, offline index, the Fishery and other features.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
85
9
--
Xonsh
My Rec
ommendation
for
Xonsh
My Recommendation for
Xonsh
All
12
Experiences
3
Pros
7
Cons
2
Top
Pro
•••
Python as logic language, Rich Library
One doesn't need to learn another esoteric language like bash/zsh so definitely a plus for python aware DevOps
See More
Top
Con
•••
Slower than other shells
Waiting for Python 11, where performance has been rumored to greatly improve. But with current Python 10, it's significantly slower than han most other shells.
See More
FearlessConsus's Experience
Xonsh is a great shell, mixing python and bash where I need to automate processes. And a nice list of plugins making it interactive better than zsh or fish. I use it as a login on non-critical production. So far so 👍
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Easy to understand, Python-like syntax
Xonsh uses a syntax which is a superset of Python 3.4 plus some additional shell primitives. Because of the similarity to Python, which is famously an easy to understand programming language, the syntax of Xonsh is pretty easy to grasp too, even more so for Python programmers.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Most editors do not have support for it
Emacs, Atom, and most other text editors do not have support for Xonsh syntax highlighting, completion, etc.
See More
ConscientiousApedemak's Experience
The shell done right
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Extensions support
Xonsh has extensions support. Custom prompt, powerline and auto completer based on history.
See More
Andro West's Experience
Great shell for beginners and experts, gain flexibility between shell and python, well done xonsh.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Command history on steroids - including output
Xonsh has one feature that can be considered particularly unique. It stores not just the commands you type, but their output, and doing a search on your history (configurably) can search the output as well.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Excellent for shell scripts
Being able to mix Python and Bash syntax is very powerful, choose the best features of each.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Extensible
Most parts of xonsh are extensible. You can change tab-completer, prompt, history backend, aliases, functions and pack it to special package (called "xontrib") and put it on Github. The logic are clear and documented well.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Cross platform support
Xonsh has native cross-platform support.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
21
7
--
DASH
My Rec
ommendation
for
DASH
My Recommendation for
DASH
All
6
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Con
•••
Doesn't support all bash features
Dash does not support all bash features, sometimes called 'bashisms' unless explicitly pointed at /bin/sh.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Fast startup
Dash has a very fast startup, this happens because the shell is started a lot of times during boot and dash minimizes the work it does during this process.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Low memory usage, which matters a lot in embedded
It is designed to be very lightweight and has no support for shell specific extensions that are not POSIX.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Default shell on Debian systems
DASH is the default shell for Debian based systems due to it speed, full POSIX compliance and low overhead.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Full POSIX support
It's fully POSIX compatible, so if your script runs on dash it will probably run on all other shells.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
A perfect clone
It's a clone of the original System V4 Bourne shell.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
9
1
--
rc
My Rec
ommendation
for
rc
My Recommendation for
rc
All
4
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
•••
Simple
rc is a very simple and easy to learn shell.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Lacks return statement
rc has no return statement.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Sane array handling
In rc $array expands to the whole array and if one of the elements of the array has spaces in it, it's still considered one single element after the array variable expansion.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
C-like syntax
rc has very C-like syntax, which is very helpful for people who are used to C-like programming languages and will find rc's syntax very enjoyable. For example: for (i in `{seq 1 100}) { echo $i }
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
4
--
eshell
My Rec
ommendation
for
eshell
My Recommendation for
eshell
All
4
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
•••
Scriptable in Emacs Lisp
See More
Top
Con
•••
Needs setup for interactive applications (i.e. ncurses)
See eshell-visual-commands
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Can invoke almost any elisp function loaded in Emacs
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Highly integrated in Emacs, providing all its features within the shell
Details on https://ambrevar.bitbucket.io/emacs-eshell/
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
4
--
IPython
My Rec
ommendation
for
IPython
My Recommendation for
IPython
All
4
Experiences
1
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
•••
Predictable behavior
No obscure modes like Bash's shopt -s nullglob are needed to make simple things done.
See More
Top
Con
•••
No command completion (only for Python)
See More
Ajay Kumar Rawani's Experience
Awesome !
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Familiar Python syntax
Extended with system shell commands helps to avoid learning another language.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
6
2
--
sh
My Rec
ommendation
for
sh
My Recommendation for
sh
All
3
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Con
•••
Not suitable for interactive use
The Bourne shell has always been criticized (most notably by Bill Joy, author of csh) as being unfriendly for interactive use. It has no tilde (~) expansion. Limited file test operators. Limited math operators.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Truely the most broadly available shell
It may not be the best if you want power, but if you want to write a POSIX script that will run everywhere, it's a pretty good choice.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Most influential Unix shell alongside csh
Bourne shell introduced features such as piping, here documents, command substitution, variables, control structures for condition-testing and looping and filename wildcarding.
See More
Hide
See All
Recommend
9
7
--
tcsh
My Rec
ommendation
for
tcsh
My Recommendation for
tcsh
All
5
Pros
2
Cons
3
Top
Pro
•••
C-like shell
It's a C-like shell with tenex command-completion feature, which is very convenient.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Not really good for programming
This is because it gets weird in some unusual syntax cases.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Organized documentation
All the documentation that's needed to use tcsh is located in man tcsh instead of being spread on various helper programs.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Limited support online
The support and number of guides and tutorials is rather limited for tcsh online because there are not many people who use it. At least compared to some of the other more popular alternatives.
See More
Top
Con
•••
You can't build complex chains
No ability to redirect arbitrary file descriptors, ie >&5.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
7
5
--
mksh (MirBSD Korn Shell)
My Rec
ommendation
for
mksh (MirBSD Korn Shell)
My Recommendation for
mksh (MirBSD Korn Shell)
All
3
Pros
1
Cons
2
Top
Con
•••
Lots of incompatibilities with the real Korn shell
Not only is this no longer being actively maintained it doesn't even faithfully mimic the behavior of the real Korn shell.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Very fast
mksh is very light on resources it needs to use and as a result it's quite fast. It also gets better results consistently than other alternatives when comparing benchmarks.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Development is pretty slow
Mksh is part of MirBSD which is barely even being developed nowadays.
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
1
1
--
eltclsh
My Rec
ommendation
for
eltclsh
My Recommendation for
eltclsh
All
3
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
•••
A more consistent alternative to the POSIX shell
Tcl is a saner scripting language built on the same principle as the Unix shell (everything is a string) with more than a hint of Lisp. eltclsh makes it possible to use Tcl interactively with tab completion for both language constructs and file paths. The result is that you can develop a snippet of Tcl code interactively and then paste it in your script.
See More
Top
Con
•••
Stability
eltclsh crashes on mismatched delimiters.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
TclVFS
TclVFS allows you access files inside ZIP archives or on remote HTTP and FTP servers like you would local files. If you put "package require vfs::urltype; vfs::urltype::Mount http" in your ~/.eltclshrc you can do things like "file copy http://example.com/file /tmp/file" (HTTPS is currently not supported by TclVFS.)
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
2
2
--
Perl
My Rec
ommendation
for
Perl
My Recommendation for
Perl
All
3
Pros
3
Top
Pro
•••
Native and powerful regex engine
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Tons of modules (CPAN)
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Interface to all of POSIX routines
See More
Hide
See All
Recommend
1
1
--
ksh
My Rec
ommendation
for
ksh
My Recommendation for
ksh
All
2
Experiences
1
Pros
1
Top
Pro
•••
It's a de facto standard
ksh comes from Bill Joy, in the days before Bash, and it's also native to Solaris so you should always write your scripts to support this shell.
See More
tallship's Experience
Dash is okay for quick scripts. Bash is undeniably the defacto standard, but ksh is a mainstay and all of your scripts, in order to be completely portable, should incorporate this where compatability into your scripts. zsh is nice, but with a wholly unsupported environment in all Unices, so you should best be advised to write with Bash, with compatibility for ksh, and since Mac defaults to zsh, have provisions in all of your scripts for those, for maximum portability.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
Recommend
3
3
--
Ammonite Shell
My Rec
ommendation
for
Ammonite Shell
My Recommendation for
Ammonite Shell
All
6
Experiences
1
Pros
4
Cons
1
Top
Con
•••
Uses JVM and more memory than regular shells
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Powerful
Can call any 3rd party executable or use any Maven library.
See More
David Pérez's Experience
Used mainly for scripting, but also useful interactively.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Easy to automate any task
When bash scripts start being complex, they can be converted to Ammonite.
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Tab completion
See More
Top
Pro
•••
Well documented
See More
Hide
See All
Get it
here
Recommend
1
1
--
csh
My Rec
ommendation
for
csh
My Recommendation for
csh
All
1
Pros
1
Top
Pro
•••
Most influential Unix shell alongside sh
C shell introduced functionality such as history and editing mechanisms, aliases, directory stacks, tilde notation, cdpath, job control and path hashing.
See More
Hide
Recommend
2
4
Don't see your favorite option? Add it.
--
oh-my-zsh
My Rec
ommendation
for
oh-my-zsh
My Recommendation for
oh-my-zsh
Get it
here
Recommend
7
3
--
bash
My Rec
ommendation
for
bash
My Recommendation for
bash
Recommend
4
1
--
bashpodder
My Rec
ommendation
for
bashpodder
My Recommendation for
bashpodder
Get it
here
Recommend
1
--
Bash $PS1 Generator 2.0
My Rec
ommendation
for
Bash $PS1 Generator 2.0
My Recommendation for
Bash $PS1 Generator 2.0
Get it
here
Recommend
1
See flagged products
Hide flagged products
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
One sec!
Are you sure that you want to abandon your hard work?
Delete Work
Continue working
{}
undefined
url next
price drop