2
User
Recs.
Recs.
17
Updates
Last
Updated
Updated
Activity
17 Options
Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS. As far as programming languages go, Clojure is known for its well-designedness and its firm programming-language heritage. For CSS, this means both great power and well-thought out design are at your fingertips.
Specs
Specs are quantitative aspects of the option such as the price
Pros
Pro Clean syntax
Other options listed include various pain-points like use of @ symbols or too much cruft; because Garden is just Clojure, and Clojure is a very well-designed language aimed to emphasize simplicity and positive developer experience (without semantic whitespace problems), you have the full benefit of a well-designed and general-purpose syntax.
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Cons
Recommendations
Garden (Clojure)
Recommended 7 years ago
Styling my applications in Garden has been a joy; the hot-loading means I no longer need to use my in-browser developer tools much at all.
Pro
Full-stack Clojure with ClojureScript for front-end + Clojure for backendPro
Style webpages with a full programming languagePro
Hot loadingCon
Harder to apply shared stylesPro
Styles as data-nesting are obviousGarden (Clojure)
Recommended 7 years ago
Garden takes its place in the truest full-stack experience I've had, and does so in excellent fashion
Pro
Full-stack Clojure with ClojureScript for front-end + Clojure for backendPro
Style webpages with a full programming languagePro
Hot loadingPro
Styles as data-nesting are obviousPro
CSS-engine accessible from front-endPro
Clean syntaxCurrently displaying 2 out of 2 total recommendations.
Comments
