What are the best JavaScript frontend frameworks?

Question

Development

What are the best JavaScript frontend frameworks?

14

Options
Considered

213

User
Recs.

Dec 20, 2023

Last
Updated

11 Options Considered

Best JavaScript frontend frameworks	Price	GZipped size	Price
-- Svelte	-	-	-
58 Vue.js	-	-	-
61 React	-	45K	-
-- Ember.js	-	-	Free
-- Angular	-	-	-

See Full List

Knockout

Built By the Slant team

Find the best product instantly.

4.7 star rating

Try it now - it's free

score 22 · Answer 1

Svelte

Top Pro

Very simple app structure

No need to buy an atlas to navigate your codebase. Very intuitive. See More

Top Con

Not popular enough at jobs

Recently there are almost no Cons for svelte itself, except not used enough at jobs, but I see a growing statistics for Svelte jobs all the time. It really helps organizations to save cost if they adopt it, due to being simple and declarative, well structure compared to other frameworks, it results in efficiency and continuous development benefit, when a work is passed to the next employee. Complex projects in some frameworks can't be recovered when an employee leaves, this means must do it from the scratch. See More

ArticulateKingu's Experience

Is the best choice currently. Superb developer experience: other frameworks really fall behind on this matter, it works best with web standards, just copy/paste most my vanilla standard code in a component and works. provides many goodies by default include smooth graphics and animations, It might be the next web standard. (htmlx) See More

Top Pro

Clean, enjoyable syntax

Much like vue.js the HTML/CSS of a component lives inside the .svelte files, and the CSS is locally scoped so there are no conflicts. Makes styling less of a headache. See More

IndustriousHanXiangzi's Experience

An absolute breeze to learn enough of the basics to get up and running in no time. Since it is not a framework in the sense that we are all used to (it's really just a compiler that produces highly optimized vanilla js based on your svelte files) there is no bulky codebase to ship with your code. The result is a tiny bundle that is snappy and a job to work with. See More

Top Pro

Small bundle

This really is a vanishing framework(okay it's a compiler). Either way, the more we can slim down the interwebs the better. See More

Top Pro

Great performance

Has a native feel to it that one does not find often, paired with Sapper this feeling multiplies. See More

Top Pro

Most compatible with your standard vanilla HTML5

I just copy paste my vanilla code in a component with minimal or no alterations, it works. then later can update it to become simple Svelte ! See More

Top Pro

Best developer experience

Is conceptual: can concentrate on your goal instead of issues. Efficient: no unnecessary bloat like other frameworks. See More

Top Pro

Good community at present

Great community, great youtube tutorials from the the top educators. great discord community for any problem, great original online tutorial (svelte.dev). The v3 shines and is the most adopted framework at 2020, most youtube reviewers adopt it after their review therefore increase the community hugely by their audience, Svelte is very active in development and support on github, they have kept up with all the bug fixes. See More

See All

score 44 · Answer 2

Vue.js

Top Pro

Easy & fast & quick to implement and develop

All basics are officially provided (state management, router, dev tools ). Freedom - do your achitecture as you please, (and use JSX or Typescript if you're bored). See More

Top Con

Template syntax

Weird syntax instead of leveraging javascript See More

Florian Gaul's Experience

Fast, stable and most importantly easy to learn See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn

Easier than analogues, like React or Angular. See More

Top Con

Outperformed by Svelte framework

Vue was a good choice few years ago. If you are stuck in it or forced to use it(jobs,...) no problem, otherwise choose Svelte, much advantages for both pro and new developers. See More

AmbitiousPeitharchia's Experience

Three years of usage See More

Top Pro

Lightweight

Vue.js footprint is start from 21KB. See More

Top Con

There's no company behind Vue

React developed by Facebook, Angular by Google, but Vue is just the open source project. Because of this, the library is being developed on the initiative, and does not bring anything new and innovative to the javascript ecosystem. See More

Faisal Hakim's Experience

simple, straight forward, fast, very very easy to learn. Providing official tools/plugins such as router, state management, testing, and more. Very recommended. See More

Top Pro

Clear and clean

It is very clear and clean to know where JS, HTML and CSS should be placed. For comparison, react contains rendering in the middle of everything. See More

Top Con

Two-way data binding

Can lead to more buggy applications. See More

Top Pro

Strongly event-driven framework

Allows communication between components without external libraries. See More

Top Con

It feels "Chinese"

Vue copies a lot of the functionality of other libraries, just does it a little bit in its own way. Because of this, and its Chinese roots, the Vue ecosystem is looks like Chinese plagiarism. The place of Redux is Vuex, and the place of Next.js is Nuxt.js. See More

See All

score 41 · Answer 3

React

Top Pro

Easy to reuse components

Since every single UI component is created independently in JavaScript, it becomes very easy to reuse them throughout your app without having to re-write them. See More

Top Con

Old & verbose, therefore inefficient

Many patches to make a fix, This framework is too old, much testing/debugging and issues as it is verbose and developers might make mistakes. See More

HonestPtocheia's Experience

High Pace of Development See More

Specs

GZipped size:45K

Top Pro

Extremely lean syntax for declaring stateless functional components

Top Con

Limitation as it is the Facebook way

React is not the best solution for every case. React is more like "if server solves the problem then the container displays the output" type than other libs. If you are using electron you will feel it would just be better without react for handling DOM. See More

ArticulateKingu's Experience

This framework is too old, this framework was meant as a first patch to issues in HTML5 and using it is not relevant anymore, as HTML5 solved most of those issues and newer frameworks make improvement on it. don't use unless you are forced to. Is verbose and bloated, In time it became more complex, by adding patches as they can't make big breaking changes, otherwise will not be react anymore. much testing/debugging and issues. See More

Top Pro

Good debugging tools

React has an official Chrome Extension which is used as a developing and debugging tool. It can be used to quickly and painlessly debug your application or view the whole application structure as it's rendered. See More

Top Con

Heavy on memory

React's virtual DOM is fast, but it requires storing elements in the virtual and real DOM increasing memory usage for the page. This can be a real problem for single-page webapps designed to be left running in the background. See More

Top Pro

Easy to test

Due to the virtual dom just being a JavaScript object that's output by a (usually) pure render function, (usually) all you have to do is try different props and see if they have the right output. Also, there's lots of info on how to test, it's a path well traveled. See More

Top Con

Verbose

React gets a little verbose as applications get more complicated with more components. It's simply not as straightforward as simply writing HTML and JavaScript would be. See More

Top Pro

Can be used with different libraries

ReactJS can be used independently as the only library for building the front-end, or it can be used alongside JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, or even Angular. See More

Top Con

No support for legacy browsers

React has recently dropped support for Internet Explorer 8. While the library may still work on IE8, issues that affect only IE8 will not be prioritized and/or solved. See More

Top Pro

Easy to write tests

Since React's virtual DOM system is implemented completely in JavaScript, it's very easy to write UI test cases. See More

Top Con

Large file size

React's react.min.js is 145.5KB in size. It's much larger than some other libraries that offer roughly the same features and it's almost the same size as some MV* frameworks such as Angular or Ember that offer more features out of the box. Although, it should be mentioned that sometimes having a smaller library may force developers to reinvent the wheel and write inefficient implementations on features that React already has. Ending up with a larger application that's harder to maintain and/or that has bad performance. See More

Top Pro

Keep control over your app's logic

React is just a view library, so you still have (almost) full control over how you app behaves. See More

Top Con

Forcing developer to use react way (state/refs) for DOM but they are not really mature

You can use document.getElementById to obtain DOM element that is placed in other script. However, you are not allowed to use document.getElementById for the element that is placed in same script(JSX). See More

Top Pro

Extensive SVG support

Since React v0.15, SVG is fully supported. React supports all SVG attributes that are recognized by today's browsers. See More

Top Con

Template(view) mixed into code

Top Pro

Supported by Facebook and Instagram

React is built by Facebook engineers initially to be used only for their inner projects especially to solve the problem of building large complex applications with constantly changing data. See More

Top Con

Not a complete solution

React does not do everything for the developer, it's merely a tool for building the UI of a web app. It does not have support for routing or models, at least not out of the box. While some missing features can be added through libraries, to start using React and use it in production, you still would need to have experience, or at least a good grasp on what the best libraries to use would be. See More

Top Pro

Synthetic Events

DOM differences and spec inconsistencies are abstracted away. Bubbling works correctly. onChange fires onChange since that's what you'd expect (vs reality where some browsers that don't fire the change handler onBlur for some inputs). You also get top level events for free. You can declare your intention and React will figure out the optimal way to attach event handlers. See More

Top Con

Some issues with DOM manipulation libraries are possible (e.g., jQuery)

Top Pro

Small API

You only need to learn a few key concepts to be productive in React. See More

Top Con

Fractal and lack of standards.

Two organizations that both use react will both utilize it in a completely different way. A developer going from one to the other is going to have a harder time than other javascript frameworks. See More

Top Pro

Unopinionated

You're free to select the IDE, build tool, testing framework, and so on that you prefer. You can use Babel or TypeScript. React doesn't limit your options. See More

Top Con

You have to learn a new syntax

Requires to learn a custom syntax, JSX that has some gotchas and introduce complexity, a steeper learning curve, and incompatibility with other tools. Though you can opt out from JSX and use vanilla JS instead. But that is not recommended since it adds a lot of unneeded complexity which JSX tries to avoid. See More

Top Pro

Virtual DOM support

Instead of relying on the DOM, React implements a virtual DOM from scratch, allowing it to calculate precisely what needs to be patched during the next screen refresh. This is orders of magnitude faster than fiddling with the DOM itself. See More

Top Pro

Unidirectional data flow

React's one-way data binding (or one-way data flow) means that it's easy to see where and how your UI is updated and where you need to make changes. It's also very easy to keep everything modular, fast and well-organized. See More

Top Pro

Tested on Facebook itself

React is used on one of the most visited websites on the planet, Facebook. With stellar results and with million of people experiencing it every day. See More

Top Pro

Template engine independent

React provides a template engine (JSX) which is easy to use. But it's not mandatory. See More

Top Pro

Server side rendering

React can render it's components and data server side, then it sends those components as HTML to the browser. This ensures faster initial loading time and SEO friendliness out of the box, since it's indexed as any other static website by search engines. See More

Top Pro

React Native

Knowing react, you can write native mobile applications using React Native! Yay! See More

Top Pro

Functional programming style leads to less buggy UIs

Top Pro

One-way data flow

React's one-way data binding (or one-way data flow) means that it's easy to see where and how your UI is updated and where you need to make changes. It's also very easy to keep everything modular, fast and well-organized. See More

Top Pro

Flux architecture pattern

Flux is a platform agnostic pattern which can technically be used with any application or programming language. One of Flux' main features is that it enforces uni-directional data flow which means that views do not change the data directly. With React this is useful because this way it's easier to understand an application as it starts getting more complicated. By having two-way data binding, lead to unpredictable changes, where changing one model's data would end up updating another model. By using the Flux architecture, this can be avoided. See More

Top Pro

Supported by ClojureScript libraries

Reagent, Om, Rum, etc. See More

See All

score 14 · Answer 4

Ember.js

Top Pro

Complete front-end stack

Ember is practically a complete full-stack front-end framework. It comes with it's own asset pipeline, router, services etc... See More

Top Con

Large library size

At 69Kb gzipped, it is one of the largest JavaScript frameworks. This means Ember might be an overkill to use on simpler projects. See More

DynamicKhonsu's Experience

Working with Ember is awesome. See More

Specs

Price:Free

Top Pro

Stunning developer experience

You build products instead of constantly configuring the stuff. See More

Top Con

Opinionated in terms of application structure

Ember already defines the general application structure and organization for you. While someone can arguee that it help beginners, in many ways it can becomes oversized and even dificult small tasks. See More

MemorableShivini's Experience

Product focused instead of reinventing the wheel and custom configurations. Better developer experience! See More

Top Pro

Ember's Object model makes the framework extremely consistent

Most of Ember's components come from the Ember Object Model. It's the basis for views, controllers, models and even the framework itself. This means that the framework is extremely consistent since almost every component shares the same core functionalities and properties since they are all derived from the same object. See More

Top Con

Steep learning curve

Ember.js has a rather steep learning curve for beginners. See More

Top Pro

Easy data access

Most web applications accomplish data persistence by storing data on the server. But Ember.js makes data retrieval and manipulation a breeze with a library called Ember Data. Ember Data provides ORM functionality that works with any backend using adapters which map operations on model objects in the frontend to the database persistence layer in the backend. See More

Top Pro

Helps developers with keeping the structure of the application clean and simple

Ember already defines the general application structure and organization for you. This was done to prevent developers from making mistakes which would needlessly over-complicate their application. While it's still possible to go out of these practices forced to developers by the Ember authors, you still have to go out of your way to force them. See More

Top Pro

Can render the page according to any of the developer's needs because of computed properties

Having custom properties in your templates is itself a huge plus but having custom computed properties is an even greater benefit, since now you can code your custom function as a property and call it from your template. Hence rendering your page exactly according to your needs. See More

Top Pro

Excellent routing

Route handlers for the URLs can see a wide range of possible application states, asynchronous logic in the router makes sure of Promises. And implementing makes sense. See More

Top Pro

Excellent data layer

Ember provides a built-in data layer, which makes it super simple to keep the UI in sync with the back end. See More

Top Pro

Clear and organized documentation

With so many amazing tools out there, a framework with a good documentation has become a distinguishing feature in choosing it for your next project. Forunately Ember.js does provide you with a very readable, extensive and easy-to-understand documentation. See More

Top Pro

Works great with jQuery

You can use any of jQuery’s features. See More

Top Pro

Convention over configuration

Ember follows the philosophy of "convention over configuration" meaning that it already has almost everything configured for you, so you just have to start coding and developing your project right away. See More

Top Pro

Opinionated in terms of application structure

Ember already defines the general application structure and organization for you. This was done to prevent developers from making mistakes which would needlessly over-complicate their application. While it's still possible to go out of these practices forced to developers by the Ember authors, you still have to go out of your way to force them. See More

Top Pro

Uses Glimmer 2, a very fast template rendering engine

Glimmer 2, a new and very fast template rendering engine written in TypeScript, is fast due to smaller precompiled template sizes, faster parsing and initial render, and compiles at runtime to extremely efficient assembly-like append opcodes. See More

Top Pro

Auto-updating templates

If you've used handlebars (Ember.js's templating is powered by HandleBars) helper tags in your code (like {{#each}}) you won't have to worry about updating your template each time you add/remove data from your page, Handlebars will auto update your template for you. See More

Top Pro

Useful bindings

EmberJS provides with an extremely handy feature of advanced bindings. With this you can not only set the path to the binding value in your app but also set in which direction you want the changes to propagate to (oneway, single, multiple etc). See More

Top Pro

Uses a relatively clean and easy to understand templating engine

Ember's preferred templating language is Handlebars. This is mainly because Handlebars is a logic-less templating language and Ember tries to keep it's logic outside the view. Another reason why Ember benefits from Handlebars is mostly aesthetic as Handlebar's clean syntax makes for easier to read and understand templates. Finally, Handlebars templates are compiled instead of interpreted, which means that they are much faster to load. See More

Top Pro

Out-of-the-box CLI tool which scaffolds a new project

Ember-CLI is a very useful tool. With just a couple of commands it scaffolds the code, installs dependencies and finally compiles everything itself. It's very useful to quickstart an Ember project. See More

Top Pro

Built-in router

Ember comes with built-in routing capabilities. There's no need to install third-party plugins to be able to use routes. See More

Top Pro

Promises everywhere

Promises represent an eventual state in asynchronous logic. Having promises everywhere (almost) means you could write simple and modular code, using almost any API that Ember provides. See More

See All

score 25 · Answer 5

Angular

Top Pro

Support for a composable component oriented architecture with directives

Angular uses the existing HTML structure and builds on top of it instead of requiring you to learn a new templating language. Because it's just vanilla HTML, it is more familiar, and easier for beginners to learn. Directives let Angular know which HTML elements are under its control, and how to use them. Being directly on the HTML it's more transparent what's going on, and it's possible to get a good idea of what the page is doing just by looking at the template. Also, it makes embedding possible, as you could have an angular app within an existing site so you don't have to rewrite everything at once. See More

Top Con

Steep learning curve

Angular isn't a simple framework, and because much of the magic goes on behind the scenes, it isn't easy to go from simply using the framework to being able to actually change how it works and extend it. See More

Florian Gaul's Experience

Very hard to learn (and if I say "very" I mean it) See More

Top Pro

Easy and straightforward data-binding

Data bindings are done on the DOM, which allows you to easily sync data between various parts of the DOM in a very succint matter. <body ng-app> <span>Insert your name:</span> <input type="text" ng-model="user.name" /> <h3>Echo: {{user.name}}</h3> </body> This snippet shows how the model attribute "name" is easily bound across different parts of the DOM without having to set up any extra boilerplate. See More

Top Con

It is almost mandatory to use Typescript

Although ES standard can be used, most of the documentation and resources are with Typescript. See More

ShrewdMimas's Experience

to handling and easy to binding another are routing concept. See More

Top Pro

Provides dependency injection

With dependency injection, you can load in extra javascript and new functionality just when you need it. This is particularly helpful with testing as you can swap out services for test services. It also means in single page apps you can load dependencies only as you need them instead of loading them up all up at the start. See More

Top Con

HTML template does not comply to standards

Attributes are case-sensitive, which is against the HTML standards. See More

Top Pro

Huge ecosystem of third party components

Angular is an extremely popular JavaScript framework. Because of this, developers have developed a myriad of components which can be downloaded and integrated into any Angular application. See More

Top Con

Difficult to use for isomorphic apps that render the initial template on the server in a performant way. Non issue for enterprise apps.

Top Pro

Huge community that is quickly growing

Angular has the largest community out of all Javascript MV* frameworks and there are a lot of tutorials and guides out there for new and old users alike. See More

Top Con

Explicit configuration

Users will usually need to specify stuff that is very obvious (template location, providers etc. ). See More

Top Pro

All best practices

Top Con

Two-way data binding is often considered an anti-pattern

Two-way data-binding means that a HTML element in the view and an Angular model are binded, and when one of them is changed so is the other. One-way data-binding for example does not change the model when the HTML element is changed. This is a rather controversial subject and many developers consider two-way data binding an anti-pattern and something that is useless in complex applications because it's very easy to create complex situations by using it and being unable to debug them easily or understand what's happening by just looking at the code. See More

See All

score 4 · Answer 6

Backbone

Top Con

Requires more coding compared to other frameworks

Because many features are not provided out of the box, you either have to write more base class code to get those features, or find a plugin that provides them in a way you like. It does not provide much structure either, things like memory management must be kept in mind by the developer, also the lack of view lifecycle management makes state changes prone to memory leaks. See More

Top Pro

Large community

Backbone has existed longer than most frameworks, and has a large following of users and projects using it as a framework. See More

Top Pro

Event based objects

All Backbone classes extend an events class that allows for listening and triggering functionality. Because all classes implement events by default it is easier to provide asynchronous communication between objects, and it allows better abstraction of interaction so the event emitting object does not need to know the structure or existence of the receiving object. See More

Top Pro

Lightweight unopinionated views

A lightweight view class is provided but there is no default templating method implemented. Because views are minimal it allows for much more freedom to implement views however you would like, and because of this freedom it's possible to write views to more uniquely adapt to a problem. User interactions are done within an events object that allows these interactions to be segregated from the rest of the view code which makes the behavioral aspect of the view easier to read and manage. See More

See All

score 7 · Answer 7

Polymer

Top Con

Has quirks that you need to be aware of

There are things that new developers need to be aware of when developing Polymer which aren't necessarily intuitive. For example, the way attributes are serialized into properties and the changing of properties from camel case to kebab case when they're initialized via attributes. Other examples include the need to make sure Polymer is aware of object and array manipulations via explicit notification functions or by using provided array manipulation functions in created elements. See More

Top Pro

High-Performance

Compared to multiple Web/Web-UI frameworks, Polymer is really interesting. It is a framework built on top of new W3C standards, so building custom elements and reusing or sharing them is really easy. See More

ThoughtfulPercunatele's Experience

Fits perfectly into my projects and what I need, I love Polymer with its qualities and defects. See More

Specs

v1.0 GZipped size:53K

v2.0 GZipped size (Chrome):10K

v2.0 GZipped size (Edge):36K

v2.0 GZipped size (Firefox):32K

See All Specs

Top Con

No server-side rendering

Polymer does not support server-side rendering. This results in higher loading times, more HTTP requests and it's not very SEO friendly, since search engines have no way of indexing a page if it's not rendered in the server. See More

Top Pro

Various basic components

It provides a base component. See More

TrustworthyAmm's Experience

Which one? Polymer 1,2,3,lit? Perci. Wait support for almost every other framework, but no polymer. Rinse. Repeat. See More

Top Pro

Complete web app stack support

Full app stack from data tier to routing, progressive web app, responsive layouts makes no need to seek outside of Polymer ecosystem for application features. In addition to waste set of mature web components in Polymer Elements along with Vaadin Elements there are thousands of web components in the wild comparable to jQuery plugins set. See More

Top Pro

Flex layout components

It provides Flex layout components. See More

Top Pro

API is easy to understand, based on standard

The Polymer APIs are split on application layers and follow standards on all possible ways: Web Components, CSS variables, async API via Promises and so on. See More

Top Pro

CSS is easy to apply

CSS can be applied far more comfortably than React. See More

Top Pro

No need for special debugging tools

The presence od specialized debugging tools are advertised by competitors. The all features of web components are natively supported by browser embedded development tools. See More

Top Pro

Excellent routing

The router is embedded into CLI for project creation and covers as web as Progressive web app, also fused with Polymer layouts out of the box. The shop template for CLI has a complete solution including the routing. See More

Top Pro

Developer and user-friendly

The documentation is really good, it explains the basics as well as the advanced concepts. See More

Top Pro

Has a more complete library of web components

There is a bunch of components ready to use and you can find them here. See More

Top Pro

Excellent documentation

Polymer guides you as with tools (cli, build environment, app templates,..) as with complimentary documentation on all phases of app development from creation of app as progresive web app to production deployment instructions. As Polymer is standards based, the whole community around those standards also helping in documentation and support. See More

Top Pro

Based on web components

Web Components are a collection of specifications released by W3C as a way to reduce the complexity of web apps by creating reusable components. Browser support is currently poor for web components, however Polymer is developed to make web components compatible with modern browsers. See More

Top Pro

Easily integrates with other frameworks

Because you write code that produces native HTML elements, Polymer easily integrates with other web frameworks which massively increases reusability of Polymer elements. See More

Top Pro

Easy integration with native javascript libraries

Because Polymer runs directly in the browser and just leverages web technologies, it's really easy to integrate JavaScript libraries into it such as D3 or other DOM manipulation libraries. See More

Top Pro

HTML markup is not string

HTML markup as it can be a non-string. See More

Top Pro

Polymer 3.0 Supports ES6 Modules

The latest version as of 2018 supports ECMA Script 6 (ES6) modules, that makes it compatible with other frameworks that support the standard. See More

See All

score 15 · Answer 8

Aurelia.js

Top Pro

Web standards oriented

It plays with web and JS standards (String interpolation, for of iteration in the view, HTML specs, Web Components, Custom Elements, Shadow DOM). See More

Top Con

Needs more support from community

More plugins and resources made by people outside the Aurelia core team will really improve this framework. See More

TrustingSarutahikoOkami's Experience

I have played with the others, I find Aurelia to be the most forward thinking, and with the most translatable structure. If you start with Aurelia, you will be able to pick up any other framework. The lack of community, I believe is in part due to the fact: you don't run into as many issues out of the box. They now have a discourse on the official website, and thier gitter is very active. See More

Top Pro

It separates responsibilities

View is HTML, ViewModel a JS class, the logic (Model) it is delegated to another class. High cohesion is guaranteed in this aspect. See More

Sadegh hp's Experience

Just Simple! Standards See More

Top Pro

It uses convention over configuration

Instead of configuring everything explicitly, Aurelia.js avoids it and relies on conventions instead. See More

PrivatePachaKamaq's Experience

careers.microsoft.com using aurelia. See More

Top Pro

It is mostly Javascript: unobstrusive

When programming on Aurelia, it is mostly programming on Javascript. This because the use of the paradigm of Inversion of Control. See More

Top Pro

Structure

Aurelia.js consists of modules that can be used as a full framework or separately See More

Top Pro

Great documentation

One of the most crucial pieces of any new technology or framework is the documentation. At present even though Aurelia is pre-beta, the documentation is pretty complete. There are code examples missing and whatnot, but for the most part it is concise and makes the main parts of the application easy to understand. See More

See All

Answer 9

Sencha Ext JS

score 1 · Answer 10

Cyclow

Top Pro

Light

Top Pro

Fast

Top Pro

Scalable

Top Pro

Reactive

See All

11 Options Considered

My Recommendation for Svelte

My Recommendation for Svelte

Very simple app structure

Not popular enough at jobs

Clean, enjoyable syntax

Small bundle

Great performance

Most compatible with your standard vanilla HTML5

Best developer experience

Good community at present

My Recommendation for Vue.js

My Recommendation for Vue.js

Easy & fast & quick to implement and develop

Template syntax

Easy to learn

Outperformed by Svelte framework

Lightweight

There's no company behind Vue

Clear and clean

Two-way data binding

Strongly event-driven framework

It feels "Chinese"

My Recommendation for React

My Recommendation for React

Easy to reuse components

Old & verbose, therefore inefficient

Extremely lean syntax for declaring stateless functional components

Limitation as it is the Facebook way

Good debugging tools

Heavy on memory

Easy to test

Verbose

Can be used with different libraries

No support for legacy browsers

Easy to write tests

Large file size

Keep control over your app's logic

Forcing developer to use react way (state/refs) for DOM but they are not really mature

Extensive SVG support

Template(view) mixed into code

Supported by Facebook and Instagram

Not a complete solution

Synthetic Events

Some issues with DOM manipulation libraries are possible (e.g., jQuery)

Small API

Fractal and lack of standards.

Unopinionated

You have to learn a new syntax

Virtual DOM support

Unidirectional data flow

Tested on Facebook itself

Template engine independent

Server side rendering

React Native

Functional programming style leads to less buggy UIs

One-way data flow

Flux architecture pattern

Supported by ClojureScript libraries

My Recommendation for Ember.js

My Recommendation for Ember.js

Complete front-end stack

Large library size

Stunning developer experience

Opinionated in terms of application structure

Ember's Object model makes the framework extremely consistent

Steep learning curve

Easy data access

Helps developers with keeping the structure of the application clean and simple

Can render the page according to any of the developer's needs because of computed properties

Excellent routing

Excellent data layer

Clear and organized documentation

Works great with jQuery

Convention over configuration

Opinionated in terms of application structure

Uses Glimmer 2, a very fast template rendering engine

Auto-updating templates

Useful bindings

Uses a relatively clean and easy to understand templating engine