Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhat are the best hosted continuous integration services with Windows support?
5
Options
Considered
Considered
Last
Updated
Updated
Join our communityTop Con
•••Top Pro
•••Top Pro
•••Top Con
•••Top Pro
•••
Although TeamCity provides an easy "Version labeling" option, it is hard to pass this version number to other build configurations, say from build A to build B. One way to do it is using a "Build-Chain" where a version project is the first in a build-chain shared by other projects. See More
The user can easily compose dependencies between builds by adding snapshot and artifact dependencies, all on the one screen. All output of upstream builds is available to downstream builds. Triggering sets off the entire build chain and supports re-running of the portions of the chain that failed. See More
The fact that it is based on Java does not hinder TeamCity's ability to support different build environments. TeamCity in fact supports a large number of languages and tools for each of those languages (build runners and test frameworks). Some of the languages/platforms that are supported include: Ruby, .NET, Java. See More
AppVeyor's configuration (which is done from the .yaml file in the root of the project) is unfortunately very limited. The configuration is either tied to a branch or, in other cases, it's global. This limits the developer to a single build process. However, since you can use arbitrary scripts for building, all those limitations can be overcome. Configuration can also be done from the web UI without a .yaml file. See More
Well I suggest you check it out for yourself, but what I like most is that it's simple yet effective: no bells and whistles, simple black/grey/light-blue/white color scheme, it's immediately clear where you have to go for each specific task, and build settings pages are like that as well. Getting a 'standard' build running literally took me a minute the first time I used it. See More