What are the best cross-platform GUI toolkits?

Question

23

Options
Considered

313

User
Recs.

Apr 13, 2019

Last
Updated

Here’s the Deal

The Best 1 of 22 OptionsWhy?

Best cross-platform GUI toolkits	Price	Platforms	Popular Language Bindings
90 wxWidgets	Free	Windows, Linux, Mac, BSD, Solaris, AIX, OS2	wxPython, wxLua, wxRuby, more...
87 Qt	Free / paid	X11, Wayland, MacOS, Windows, Android, IOS	-
71 Java / Swing	-	-	-
-- Agar	-	-	-
-- nuklear	-	-	-

See Full List

21 Other Options Considered

Qt

Top Pro

Mature and rich library

The are modules for networking, translation, database, data formats, printer support, and more. See More

Top Con

Expensive licence for non-open source developers

$459/month See More

smit patil's Experience

A complete FrameWork See More

Specs

Platforms:X11, Wayland, MacOS, Windows, Android, IOS

Mobile targets:Android, Tizen, IOS, Plasma Mobile, Blackbery

Top Pro

It looks great

Even though beauty is in the eye of the beholder, Qt apps are some of the best looking ones out there. They use the standard OS look and feel See More

Top Con

Non-standard C++ features

Signal/slots and introspection are managed by a C++ precompiler, the meta object compiler (MOC). See More

Top Pro

Best documentation of any development platform

The comprehensiveness of the Qt5 documentation is setting a new bar in the industry. Not only does it explore the entire toolkit in incredible depth, but it does so without being obtuse or using an excess of unfamiliar language. See More

Top Con

Few community widgets available

Top Pro

Good documentation

Professional, thorough documentation with examples, available either in a web browser or in the stand-alone desktop client called assistant. See More

Top Con

GUI Render

On Intel video cards, qml windows have render issues. See More

Top Pro

Global community

The community behind Qt is both massive and approachable. Digia (also owners) are joined by the likes of Intel, KDAB, ICS, Canonical and numerous others in sponsoring development, while communities such as KDE also contribute significantly. Forums are active, mailing lists are open, irc channels chatting, git repositories well managed. Answers to questions are usually minutes away. See More

Top Con

Limited SVG support

Compared to other toolkits QtSVG supports only SVGTiny 1.2. See More

Top Pro

Bindings for Python and other languages

Top Pro

Open-source

But commercial users have to pay $459 per month, per developer ! See More

Top Pro

Stable

Only a few bugs. It is easy to migrate between major versions. See More

Top Pro

Mobile support

Top Pro

Event handling is very simple

Qt was written in C++, as opposed to GTK which was written in C. The fact that C++ has been described at "C with classes" lends itself to explaining how the handling of events is so much simpler under Qt. See More

Top Pro

Great integration

Qt integrates itself perfectly into all major desktops and operating systems. See More

See All

Agar

Top Pro

Outdated look

OrganizedGefjun's Experience

Nice looking See More

nuklear

Top Pro

A single-header ANSI C gui library

Top Con

Very limited documentation

Top Pro

MIT/Public Domain License

Top Con

No input or output implementation provided

User must connect with OS or other libraries to get input or display output on any platform. See More

Top Pro

Small codebase (~18kLOC)

Top Pro

No dependencies (not even the standard library if not wanted)

Top Pro

Bindings for popular languages

Bindings for languages like C#, Java, Python, Go, Nim, Lua and Rust. See More

Top Pro

Fully skinnable and customizable

Top Pro

Focus on portability, efficiency and simplicity

Top Pro

Customizable library modules (you can compile and use only what you need)

See All

JavaFX

Top Pro

CSS support for widgets

DebonairRongo's Experience

One of my most loved gui framework. See More

Top Pro

Same GUI appearance between operating systems

OrganizedGefjun's Experience

Very Nice Looking default theme See More

See All

Electron

Top Con

Not native

Electron uses a web view. This basically means it is just a website wrapped to look like a native application. This is convenient because you can use web tech to develop the application, but it won't be so performant. See More

Top Pro

Excellent

Create functional desktop apps with your web skills. Gentle learning curve if you already know web. See More

Chicken Mcgee's Experience

I would say Electron has its ups and downs. I read that Spotify uses it as well as Slack. So some heavy industry players. In essence, the engine that powers Electron is the same engine that powers your web browser. Some cons to consider is that expect your binary application to be on the "bloated" side, so a minimum of ~100mb. Also consider that it might be considered a "ram-eater" such as you see with Google Chrome. Overall though, you would have to weigh what you value in terms of its pros and cons. See More

Top Con

Apps can have memory issues

Apps made with Electron are likely to have memory issues unless you specifically design the app with efficient coding. See More

Top Pro

Crash reporter

Submit crash reports to a remote server (built-in). See https://electronjs.org/docs/api/crash-reporter. See More

Top Con

No system integration

As it is basically a website running inside a window, there is no integration with the host system. See More

Top Pro

Auto-updates

Enable apps to automatically update themselves. See https://electronjs.org/docs/api/auto-updater. See More

Top Con

Poorly optimized and resource intensive

It's like running a Chrome-tab for every app you open. See More

Top Pro

Healthy community

Github is behind electron and there are a lot of big companies using it to make their cross-platform apps. See More

Top Pro

Great documentation

Electron has a nice website with great documentation. It also features a lot of samples. See More

See All

Avalonia

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac, Android, iOS

Squid C# GUI

RickZeeland's Experience

Free and open source GUI library for realtime 2D and 3D applications. See More

Sciter

Top Pro

Lightweight

Only a single native DLL. See More

Top Con

Linux version is not very mature

The Linux version is missing HTML/CSS features when compared to the Windows version. See More

RickZeeland's Experience

Sciter allows designing an application in a completely platform independent manner. It is free for commercial use, although it is not open-source. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac

Popular Language Bindings:C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, PowerBuilder

Top Pro

Multi language

Support for C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, Powerbuilder. See Go bindings on GitHub. The binding for C# on GitHub, SciterSharp does not seem to be free: in a commercial product you should acquire a commercial license. See More

Top Con

Not fully HTML5 compliant

Lacking HTML5 functionality and W3C standards: grabbing a library like JQuery or Bootstrap and use it in Sciter will not work. See More

Top Con

Not WYSIWYG

Not WYSIWYG like WebForms or WPF. See More

See All

Xojo

Top Con

Subscription-based/Not free

Using this product you're betting the company will still be around. If they get bought out by an enterprise that wants to use the tech internally, all they need to do is stop offering subscriptions and suddenly you're scrambling to rebuild your entire app on other technology. See More

Top Pro

Native, compiled apps

AssertiveAnbay's Experience

We use it at my current employer for our desktop apps. Not a good product. Requires a lot of workarounds to get the app to work well on macOS and Windows, due to bugs and inconsistent behavior across different platforms. It is not as a seamless and as easy as Xojo would have you believe. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac, Pi, Web,iOS

Top Con

Proprietary Dialect of BASIC

Top Pro

Cross-platform

Supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Pi and iOS. See More

Top Con

Bugs rarely get fixed

The desktop targets don’t get any more love or attention from Xojo, they are all about mobile and raspberry pi. That’s okay if that’s all you need. But if you rely on it for cross-platform desktop development then that’s a problem. The framework is buggy and inconsistent in its behavior between macOS and Windows, so you will find yourself compensating for it by relying on the native APIs and having a lot of conditionally compiled code for each platform. Negating the “Rapid” in RAD. See More

Top Con

Missing features

No auto layout so any marginally sophisticated UI will have to be done programmatically. And because its behavior isn’t consistent across platforms, you will have a lot of conditionally compiled UI code The laggish, flickering UI on Windows looks really bad and slow in the 2018 Beta version. You can literally see it drawing the UI which is astonishing. It will also switch transparency off for all your UI elements, so switching to it somewhere in 2018 will probably be unpleasant. No modern programming features like lambdas, higher order functions, generics, exception-free locking or preemptive multithreading. Your Xojo app will run on a single core and with primitive locking mechanisms. See More

Top Con

No Android support

They plan to eventually support Android, but for now, they only support iOS. See More

See All

Clutter

Add Video or Image

NanoGUI

Add Video or Image

Morphic

Top Pro

Multiple languages

Including Python, JavaScript, Self, Smalltalk, and Objective-C. See More

Request recommendations from the community

I Recommend...

Help millions of people make better decisions.

Each month, over 2.8 million people use Slant to find the best products and share their knowledge. Pick the tags you’re passionate about to get a personalized feed and begin contributing your knowledge.