When comparing Hugo vs fasty, the Slant community recommends Hugo for most people. In the question“What is the fastest CMS for web content (news website with some static pages) ?” Hugo is ranked 1st while fasty is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Hugo is:
Code can be viewed [on GitHub](http://github.com/spf13/hugo).
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Open-source and free
Code can be viewed on GitHub.
Pro Single Binary - Cross Platform
Pro No dependencies
All other SSGs expect you to have a full toolchain setup for their language. Hugo is written in Go and distributed as an executable for unix, linux, windows and mac. Just download and run.
Pro Clean workflow
Create your new site, run the Hugo server, edit. Lather, rinse, repeat. Hugo stays out of the way.
Pro Good documentation
Pro Many themes available
Pro Draft mode
Allows you to see changes in real time.
Pro Very active community
Pro Easy to add new content types, data files, and taxonomies
Work on a staging website and deploy on production (1 click)
Pro API Builder
You can manage your API directly within the admin UI. No need to deploy ... You just need to click on the publish button
Pro It's flexible
You can add partials and link a partial to a specific dataset (e.g. an AQL request) so creating dynamic content is easy.
Pro Blazing fast
it has a built-in cache.
Con No tutorial on how to create a theme from scratch
Con young project
the doc, the website is still not ready
Con It need Docker
If you know how to use docker it's very easy ... if not, it can be complicated.