When comparing ROX Desktop vs krusader, the Slant community recommends krusader for most people. In the question“What are the best file managers for UNIX-like systems?” krusader is ranked 22nd while ROX Desktop is ranked 24th. The most important reason people chose krusader is:
Has everything you might wish for and more.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast
Programs open noticeably faster with ROX Desktop than with most other Desktop Environments.
Pro Official packages for major distributions
ROX can be built from source like many other solutions or can be installed from official packages available for all the major distributions (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, openSUSE, Mandriva and Slackware).
Pro Singular load/save dialog
Instead of learning and navigating a multitude of file dialogs, simply drag and drop files between your app and your folders.
Pro Versatile
Has everything you might wish for and more.
Pro Root mode
Dangerous but sometimes useful.
Pro Multiple tabs
Tabs with other listings, and options to move the tab to the other side.
Pro Advanced renamer
Via package krename.
Pro Directory compare
Compare 2 directories on content or file/date and sync them.
Pro Archive support
Browse archives as folders.
Cons
Con Discontinued
discontinued since years, only the filemanager, the terminal and zeroinstall are still developed
Con Very ugly UI
Con Redundant default configuration
Because speed is one of the main points and objectives of ROX, the default configuration can be redundant for some and it's design also makes a lot of assumptions on how users prefer to work.