When comparing Rally.org vs Early Access, the Slant community recommends Early Access for most people. In the question“What are the best ways to fund development of an independent game?” Early Access is ranked 6th while Rally.org is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Early Access is:
Because early access doubles as a public playtest, you can get valuable user feedback while there's still time to implement changes.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Doesn't require a goal
No goal needs to be set to start fundraising.
Pro Processes payments directly
Rally has a in-house proprietary payments system. There's no middleman such as PayPal or Amazon needed to transfer money.
Pro Donation links can be embedded in videos and imagers
Rally.org includes a feature called covers that allows donation links to be embedded in videos and images.
Pro Can be used for ongoing fundraising
Both one-time and ongoing fundraising initiatives are supported by the platform.
Pro Get end-user feedback earlier in development
Because early access doubles as a public playtest, you can get valuable user feedback while there's still time to implement changes.
Cons
Con No real gaming community is available
The site's community is mostly interested in organizing fundraising around various social, economical and political causes.
Con Not viable until the game is in a playable state
Early access depends on consumer interest, and few consumers will be interested in an unplayable pre-alpha build. Another option must be used for early development.