When comparing Idiotech vs Jim Sterling, the Slant community recommends Idiotech for most people. In the question“Who are the best game critics? ” Idiotech is ranked 8th while Jim Sterling is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Idiotech is:
Idiotech channel is run by a person who has been a developer in the gaming industry for most of their adult life and so have a view on gaming that many other Youtube critics may not have, making ofr some insight that may not be gained elsewhere.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Insight on the gaming industry
Idiotech channel is run by a person who has been a developer in the gaming industry for most of their adult life and so have a view on gaming that many other Youtube critics may not have, making ofr some insight that may not be gained elsewhere.
Pro Provides Twitch streaming of games on top of Youtube channel
Idiotech uses Twitch streaming for games the channel is planning on reviewing. This allows users to see some of what the channel thinks of the game before a review comes out as well as see the gameplay before the full review.
Pro Not afraid to speak his mind
Jim Sterling is known for stepping on toes once in a while. In 2009 he gave Assassin's Creed II a 4 our of 10 when most reviewers praised the game, he heavily criticised Peter Molyneyx, a respected industry figure, for constantly overselling and under-delivering his games and manipulating the consumers, etc.
Pro Pro-consumer attitude
Jim Sterling has criticised Valve's Steam Greenlight for having a lack of quality control, multiple developers of "asset flipping" (presenting ready-made game engine assets as a game), the mainstream media for portraying games as causing violence, etc.
Pro Thank God for Him
Cons
Con Small channel with few followers
While being a less popular channel may not degrade the reviews it does mean that there may be less reason to continue their job in reviewing games, so time invested in following the channel may lead to an abandoned channel at some point due to not making enough funds for the time spent reviewing games.
Con Can be seen as overly hostile
As Sterling has a tendency to cover (often touchy) topics in a somewhat inflammatory, unapologetic manner, he often gets perceived as being needlessly hostile.
Con Is little more than a populist rabble rouser
Whatever gamers are upset about this week, expect the Jimquisition to be following along promptly with a preachy, whiny summation of things everyone said already.