When comparing QuickPic vs Google Slides, the Slant community recommends Google Slides for most people. In the question“What are the best Material Design apps?” Google Slides is ranked 33rd while QuickPic is ranked 55th. The most important reason people chose Google Slides is:
Google Slides is a more back-to-basics type of presentation software, so no distractions with a multitude of options and settings.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast performance loading photos
QuickPic displays photos ultra fast and performs better than most stock gallery apps. Developed with speed in mind, QuickPic will make working with any library of photos lightning quick.
Pro Supports multiple online photo album services
QuickPic integrates with: Flickr, Picasa, 500px, and many more.
Pro Supports hidden images
In order to hide an image, start the title with a period. This can be great for privacy purposes.
Pro Excellent file management tools
QuickPic offers excellent file management tools, with the ability to move and rename photos, users are in total control over the photo library. Easily find new photos by date or location with the grouping tool.
Pro Impressive video-player
Allows to lock a video in landscape mode and intuitive controls via swipe gestures.
Pro Simple and clean
Google Slides is a more back-to-basics type of presentation software, so no distractions with a multitude of options and settings.
Pro Free to use
Google Slides does offer a paid version but features are not limited by pricing.
Pro Ease of sharing and collaboration
As with all Google Documents, Google Slides can easily be shared since they live in the cloud, multiple users can also edit the slides and comment at the same time.
Pro Multi-platform
Google Slides lives in the cloud, it can be viewed and edited from virtually any platform.
Pro No software to install and maintain
Since Google Slides live in the cloud means there's no need to maintain the application. There's also nothing to install and nothing to update.
Pro No version number
Being a web-platform keeps it always up-to-date, saves the trouble of errors when presenting on older versions.
Cons
Con Buggy and unstable since acquisition by Cheetah Mobile
v5.0.0, after acquisition by Cheetah Mobile, has countless bugs and basically nonoperational. This, probably, clone of original app, assembled from alternative, home-made and very low quality source code.
Con Untrustworthy
It's owned by Cheetah Mobile. That says it all.
Con Removed from Play Store in 2018 and rightfully so
Con Limited offline functionality
Some of the tools are unavailable when editing presentations offline.
Con Just the basics
Google Slides often lack the tools for power users when editing presentations.
Con Files are stored in Google servers
In case the servers go down, your files will be inaccessible for the time being.
Con It is a Google product
Your data privacy at Google is debatable.