When comparing Sails.js vs FastAPI, the Slant community recommends FastAPI for most people. In the question“What is the best web application framework?” FastAPI is ranked 6th while Sails.js is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose FastAPI is:
It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Transparent support for Socket.io
Sails.js is built with a focus on building real time communication apps such as chat or multiplayer games, so naturally it has Socket.io extremely well supported.
Pro MVC architecture
This could be a huge plus, if you prefer to build your apps using the Model View Controller architecture. Using Sails.js you'll find the task of separating the business logic from the user interface and keeping the interactions between them in a separate layer, extremely easy.
Pro JSON API generated for free
Exposes public JSON API for free. No additional routing to be defined. Makes it pretty easy to access data from anywhere.
Pro ORM that can be plugged into any database, or even custom web service
Sails.js uses Waterline ORM at its backend which means you can store your data in any datastore that you like; all you have to do is make a change to the Waterline adapter, this will allow you to store your data in MySQL/Redis or any other kind of database.
Pro So easy to deploy and lift
Pro Great documentation and structure
Clear documentation and easy to understand. The file structure gives you a way to understand where you can start to develop when you encounter a new Sails project
Pro Dependency injection
It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc.
Pro Standards
It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0.
Pro Data validation
It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests.
Pro High-performance
It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks.
Pro Editor completion
It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere.
Pro One of the fastest growing communities
Pro Fast is really fast (!)
It's easy to develop API based applications in Python on deadlines for Android and IOS Development.
Pro Automatic docs
It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code.
Pro Database independent
It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL.
Pro Async IO / optional
It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately.
Pro World class documentation
It has some of the best documentation of any framework.
Pro WebSockets
Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets.
Pro OAuth 2.0
It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it.
Pro Background tasks
Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette.
Pro Supports GraphQL
Python's graphene library is included as an optional dependency meaning that GraphQL API's are supported out of the box, with no additional tweaking needed.
Cons
Con Poor ORM
The built-in Waterline is not well designed and is not suitable for production environments. Populating more than 1 level deep is a nightmare, there is no transaction support, new features/bug fixes are not implemented anywhere near a timely manner (the most requested feature 'deep populate' has been lingering in their github issues list for over a year and a half now).
Con Smaller community
Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. But it can grow with time.