When comparing Interactive Web Pages with JavaScript - Treehouse vs Safari, the Slant community recommends Interactive Web Pages with JavaScript - Treehouse for most people. In the question“What are the best resources for learning Javascript and the DOM API?” Interactive Web Pages with JavaScript - Treehouse is ranked 5th while Safari is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Interactive Web Pages with JavaScript - Treehouse is:
This course introduces interacting with the DOM specifically. However, Treehouse offers a variety of different courses on JavaScript, jQuery, the DOM and more.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Variety of related courses offered
This course introduces interacting with the DOM specifically. However, Treehouse offers a variety of different courses on JavaScript, jQuery, the DOM and more.
Pro Challenges for keeping the user engaged
Treehouse provides coding challenges throughout the course. You code directly in their editor, and your code is checked to make sure it's correct.
Pro Build a project as you learn
This course takes you through DOM manipulation with JavaScript by building a to-do application.
Pro Works elegantly in OSX
The rendering of the pages and the browser compatibility with OSX works smoothly, when compared to other browsers. Also you get very high battery life with Safari, when compared to Chrome.
Pro Extremely fast
Pro Sleek design
– No distraction stuff like favicons in tabs, all that borders, bevels and embosses in panels like in other browsers, no ugly shaped tabs.
– Neat adress bar.
– Good looking start “show all tabs” screen.
Pro iCloud syncing
Tabs, passwords, bookmarks and, history all sync across devices.
Pro Safari uses Webkit, a great open source web engine
Webkit is very light compared to Blink, renders web pages at an incredible speed, great CSS support and is also constantly evolving.
Cons
Con Credit card required to sign up for the free trial
Treehouse offers a free 14-day trial, but requires a credit card to sign up.
Con OSX only
Apple dropped Windows support after Safari 5.
Con Does NOT block Ads
Doesn't block ads, unlike browsers like Brave and Vivaldi.
Con Poor support for new web technologies
Safari usually takes its time when it comes to adopting new and useful web technologies meaning that the user gets an inferior experience compared to other modern browsers.
Con Proprietary
While Safari er is currently available gratis (without monetary charge) on Mac OS X, it is currently not libre (meaning that it does not allow users to view the source code used to create, to modify that code, or to redistribute modifications) and is therefore neither free nor open-source software.
Con Outdated Rendering engine
All other browsers and toolkits (Qt/GTK) have shifted to Googles Blink-fork of KHTML/Webkit so Apple is currently the only main contributor left.
Con Terrible support for open source formats like .VP9 or .ogg
Apple does not support open source formats. Instead, they use H.264 and H.265.
Con Even on OSX not the best Experience
Video controls are bad esp. on youtube. Only few browser extensions.