When comparing Waffle.io vs Azendoo, the Slant community recommends Azendoo for most people. In the question“What is the best task management software for small teams?” Azendoo is ranked 35th while Waffle.io is ranked 41st. The most important reason people chose Azendoo is:
The support team is always available and answer all your questions. They even take the time to help you get started if necessary and actually act on your feedback.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free for public repos
Any public GitHub repositories can use the software for free.
Pro Links GitHub issues with a Kanban board
Existing GitHub issues can be used to create tasks and managed in a more convenient Kanban style.
Pro Real-time
Each update is visible as soon as it is made.
Pro Available and friendly support team
The support team is always available and answer all your questions. They even take the time to help you get started if necessary and actually act on your feedback.
Pro Integrates with your other tools
Azendoo integrates with Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Box and Evernote to share files and notes with your collaborators easily. The Slack and Spark integrations keeps your collaborators in the loop, while the Zapier integration offers endless possibilities to send and receive information to and from Azendoo. The email-to-task integrations allows you to send emails to Azendoo to create tasks or conversations.
Pro Threaded conversations
Unlike team chat discussions, threaded conversations help you stay on topic, allowing you to get back to it easily without losing context. Additionally, the "create a task from conversation" feature enables us to take actions from team discussions.
Pro Display tasks in list, board and calendar views
You can use the board view for the development process, the list view for bug tracking and calendar view for setting deadlines for example.
Cons
Con Managing large project may be difficult
Waffle works best with medium to small projects and very high-level general overviews and less with projects that require very granular management due to the fact that it becomes considerably more difficult to keep track of various cards and priorities as they are pushed off screen very quickly.