Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing WEBP - Format vs Adept - Compression Technique, the Slant community recommends WEBP - Format for most people. In the question“What are the best alternatives and lossless compressors for JPEG?” WEBP - Format is ranked 1st while Adept - Compression Technique is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose WEBP - Format is:
Images saved in the WebP format have roughly the same quality as a JPEG image at about half the size.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Same quality for about half the size
Images saved in the WebP format have roughly the same quality as a JPEG image at about half the size.
Pro File size
File size is reduced reasonably
Pro Quality
Quality of the compression is reasonably good
Cons
Con Garbage format
Ultra compression algorithm destroys any traces of quality...is another google emanation...is not a copy of an image not even a preview or thumb is just a luke-like representation of the original image...destroys color profile and outlines look horrible... avoid this if you have respect for quality.
Con Not widely supported
Only has native support in Chrome and Opera.
Con Time taken to compress
It takes a lot of time to apply the compression
