When comparing BPG - Format vs JPEG Mini - Compressor, the Slant community recommends BPG - Format for most people. In the question“What are the best alternatives and lossless compressors for JPEG?” BPG - Format is ranked 2nd while JPEG Mini - Compressor is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose BPG - Format is:
BPG is able to produce the same image quality as JPEG but at half the size. This is simply because is uses a newer codec, x265 which is the open-source implementation of HEVC/H.265.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Same image quality, half the size
BPG is able to produce the same image quality as JPEG but at half the size. This is simply because is uses a newer codec, x265 which is the open-source implementation of HEVC/H.265.
Pro Open source
BPG is an open source implementation which only took a few months to be created. It is not created by some international standardization body (like ITU or ISO), which take several years to create and update standards.
Since it's open source, changes can be proposed at any time, and if they benefit the project, they are merged into the main branch. This ensures that the standard is always up to date and that fixes can come quickly.
Pro More bits per color channel
BPG is able to render more bits per color channel compared to JPEG. 14 bits vs just 8 bits.
Pro Alpha channel
BPG has an alpha channel, which adds transparency to BPG images if needed.
Pro Quality
Even though the file size is reduced heavily, the quality of the image is retained
Pro Time
It applies the compression real quick
Pro File size
Reduces file sizes of JPEG up to 6 times based on the dimension of the image
Cons
Con is an underground image format...
is not suported by actual profesional viewers or editors
Con No native support in browsers
No browsers support native decoding of this format yet. It should be noted though, that there's a JavaScript implementation of the decoder which can execute and decode BPG files.
Con License
It is not open source
Alternative Products
