When comparing Seapine TestTrack ALM vs MaxiBug, the Slant community recommends MaxiBug for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” MaxiBug is ranked 11th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 27th.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool
TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.
Pro Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document
Pro Supports full SCM integration
Pro Supports full Traceability
Pro Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.
Pro Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development
You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.
Pro Free
Pro Drag & Drop
Images can be dragged and dropped on the Issue form.
Pro Git support
From version 1.1.0 in the Issue form the "Git history" tab can be selected, and by pressing the sync button the Git history for an issue can be retrieved.
Pro Single exe
All that is needed is a single exe (file size less than 3 MB) and a PostgreSQL server, the database will be created automatically.
Cons
Con Steep learning curve
TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.
Con PostgreSQL knowledge needed
There should be at least one person in the team that can administer a PostgreSQL server with user roles and rights.
Con Virus warning
Might give a false virus warning on some Windows versions when using the Edge browser, try with Chrome instead.
If someone would like to sponsor a paid authenticode certificate this might be solved, please leave a comment!