Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Armed Bear Common Lisp vs CLISP, the Slant community recommends Armed Bear Common Lisp for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source Common Lisp implementations for Windows?” Armed Bear Common Lisp is ranked 3rd while CLISP is ranked 4th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can be integrated into java programs for scripting capabilities
Pro Fairly simple to learn and use
Written and interoperable with Java.
Pro Cross platform byte code
The CLISP bytecode is the same across platforms.
Cons
Con The java API isn't always enough
Some of its features are made private and can't easily be modified from java.
Con Can be slow and clunky because of the java overhead
It is using java.
Java is slow.
Ergo: abcl is slow.
Con Slowed maintenance
Maintenance of CLISP has slowed to a crawl over the past few years. There's some signs this will be picking up again, but this may take a while.
Con Strong Copyleft
The runtime is under GPL.
