F# vs Erlang

F#'s syntax tends to be terse while remaining very readable and easy to understand without being a chore to write.

Since F# is not a purely functional language, it lends itself to being more easily picked up by programmers that have experience with other paradigms.

Since F# runs on the Common Language Runtime or CLR, it has access to the entire .NET Framework, as well as libraries written in other .NET languages such as C#, VB.NET, and C++/CLI.

Forget Xamarin and Mono. F# now runs on the multiplatform .Net Core!

Thanks to a project like Fable, you can write and run your client app in F# and run it over JavaScript. It allows you to share code between your server and client.

This is a .Net language natively supported by Visual Studio. Though it is not as tooled up as C# the support is still substantial. In particular, C# deployment scenarios can be enabled for it with small C# wrapper projects. Integration with Visual Studio provides: IntelliSense, debugging, projects an other features.

F# directs you into a workflow where the right way is the path of least resistance.

Coming from a C# background, its restrictions might feel arbitrary at first (e.g., what do you mean my code has to be in dependency order!? Arbitrary alphabetical or bust!), but you'll soon realize that your code is cohesive, concise and consistent in a way that it never was before - and you can compile and run with confidence!

Thanks to Xamarin, F# is a functional language that you can use to build for iOS, Android and Windows.

Erlang has strong roots with the telecom industry in which concurrent processes are normal. It's designed to be concurrent, to be used for distributed computing and to be scalable.

Fault tolerance means that a system has the property to continue operating even though one or more components have failed.

For Erlang systems, this means that the system is kept running even if for example a user has to drop a phone call rather than forcing everyone else to do so.

In order to achieve this, Erlang's VM gives you:

• Knowledge of when a process died and why that happened
• The ability to force processes to die together if they depend on each other and if one of them has a fault.
• A logger that logs every uncaught exception
• Nodes that can be monitored so that you find out when they go down
• The ability to restart failed processes (or groups of them)

In a real-time system it may not be possible to stop the system in order to implement code upgrades. For these cases Erlang gives you dynamic code upgrade support for free when using OTP. The mechanism is very easy to understand and works as follows:

1. Start the app
2. Edit the code
3. Recompile

That's all that is needed, the app updates with the new code while it's still running and tests are run automatically.

Erlang is made to be parallel and distributed. Because it's very easy to write code that uses multiple processor cores, it's also very easy to write applications that span multiple servers.

Erlang has been used in production for more than 20 years now. During that time it has proven itself over and over again that works great in both small startups and large-scale enterprise systems.

Erlang has been used extensively by Ericsson themselves. For example, the AXD301 ATM, which is one of Ericsson's flagships is probably the largest Erlang project ever with more than 1.1 million lines of Erlang code.

Erlang's processes have very little overhead (about 500 bytes per process). This means that a huge amount of processes can be created, even on older machines.

Erlang's processes run in a complete independent way from the OS (they aren't managed by the OS scheduler neither). This means that programs written in Erlang will run exactly the same way regardless of the operating system or platform.