When comparing AOC C3583FQ vs LG 27UD68-W, the Slant community recommends AOC C3583FQ for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” AOC C3583FQ is ranked 15th while LG 27UD68-W is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose AOC C3583FQ is:
The monitor uses a VA-panel, which is comparable to IPS. Image quality is excellent and aspects such as color reproduction, contrast and brightness are all great.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Great image quality
The monitor uses a VA-panel, which is comparable to IPS. Image quality is excellent and aspects such as color reproduction, contrast and brightness are all great.
Pro Good viewing angles
Another advantage of the VA-panel is the range of the viewing angles. The monitor looks great from every horizontal and vertical viewing angle and color shifting doesn't occur.
Pro Curved display increases visual workspace
The AOC C3583FQ is curved and is angled similar to the curves of the human eye. Because of the curved screen, points on the screen are spread more evenly across your eyes, which increases your visual workspace and can reduce eyestrain.
Pro Connections integrated in the base
In terms of connectivity, all ports are integrated into the base of the large display. That results in a more tidy environment and no cables dangling on the rear of the display.
Pro Extremely high refresh rate
The maximum refresh rate of this display is 160 Hz, which is extremely fast - even for high-end standards. Most high-end displays only offer up to 144 Hz, but this AOC display is a bit faster. High refresh rates are excellent for fast-paced gaming action and ensures a much greater fluidity.
Pro Works well in bright rooms
The 27UD68-W offers decent performance in bright environments, where it can get vivid enough to fight glare. The monitor can sustain the brightness of around 310 nits which means that the light coming from doors and windows will not be able to overpower the light that the panel emits.
Pro Doesn't look cloudy
Unlike some other IPS monitors, the LG 27UD68-W doesn't suffer from the dirty screen effect that is usually caused by a panel's poor overall uniformity. Large objects and panning shots look uniform on the screen. The panel's overall uniformity measures at 3.11% dE - a solid result for a monitor in this price bracket.
Cons
Con Smaller pixel density, not as sharp as other displays
The resolution of the AOC C3583FQ is Full HD, but because there's additional screen space on both sides, 2560 x 1080 pixels are displayed. This is the same pixel density as a regular 1080p non-ultrawide monitor. Because of the large screen size of 35 inch, this monitor isn't as sharp as some other displays. The amount of pixels per inch (ppi) is measured at 70.
Con Large stand-by power consumption
With a stand-by power consumption of over 60 watts, the AOC C3583FQ definitely isn't an economic display.
Con Doesn't support VESA mounting
The C3583FQ doesn't feature a VESA mount which makes wall-mounting or using an alternative stand impossible.
Con Awkward touch controls
The on-screen display and menu's of this AOC display are controlled via touch-sensitive controls on the base of the monitor. Due to the ultra-wide aspect ratio, the OSD can be a little bit awkard to control.
Con Doesn't support HDR
You can't run HDR content on this monitor.