When comparing CloudFront vs CloudFlare Red October, the Slant community recommends CloudFront for most people. In the question“What are the best software to mitigate DDOS attacks?” CloudFront is ranked 1st while CloudFlare Red October is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose CloudFront is:
CloudFront can deliver dynamic, static and streaming content.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Any type of content
CloudFront can deliver dynamic, static and streaming content.
Pro Dynamic scaling
CloudFront will allocate more hardware resources when needed automatically. It will take care of traffic spikes and accommodate product's growth without needing manual input from the user.
Pro Simple interface
Pro Tight integration with other Amazon Web Services
CloudFront integrates tightly with Amazon's storage, computing, database and networking services allowing you to use a tested and cohesively developed set of solutions.
Pro Fully open source
Red October is fully open source, from the encryption library to the UI modules. Everyone can inspect the code hosted on GitHub or fork it and implement it to suit their needs if they have to.
Pro Uses the "two-man rule" for extra security
Red October was built to add an extra layer of security inside organizations. The "two-man rule" that Red October employs means that data can only be decrypted if two or more users provide the necessary keys.
Cons
Con Can get expensive quickly
Con Uses its own crypto library
Red October uses its own crypto implementation in to encrypt secrets. While it's not necessarily a security risk, it would be safer to use a crypto library that has proven it's worth and that has been used for a long time in a lot of projects.