Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing CLISP vs Embeddable Common Lisp, the Slant community recommends Embeddable Common Lisp for most people. In the question“What are the best common lisp implementations?” Embeddable Common Lisp is ranked 2nd while CLISP is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose Embeddable Common Lisp is:
Your code can run (almost) anywhere C can. It is easy to interface with existing C programs.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
No other questions
Pros
Pro Cross platform byte code
The CLISP bytecode is the same across platforms.
Pro Compiles to C
Your code can run (almost) anywhere C can. It is easy to interface with existing C programs.
Cons
Con Slowed maintenance
Maintenance of CLISP has slowed to a crawl over the past few years. There's some signs this will be picking up again, but this may take a while.
Con Strong Copyleft
The runtime is under GPL.
No cons yet!