When comparing Uzbl vs w3m, the Slant community recommends w3m for most people. In the question“What are the best web browsers for UNIX-like systems?” w3m is ranked 25th while Uzbl is ranked 26th. The most important reason people chose w3m is:
Although w3m is primarily a text-based web browser which runs inside the terminal, it supports and renders several elements which other terminal-based browsers cannot like images, tables, tabs or frames.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Lightweight
Pro Support for several elements not found in terminal browsers
Although w3m is primarily a text-based web browser which runs inside the terminal, it supports and renders several elements which other terminal-based browsers cannot like images, tables, tabs or frames.
Pro Available as emacs plugin
W3m can also be downloaded as an emacs plugins to be used as a fast web browser that runs inside emacs.
Cons
Con Dead
Ended in 2016, version 0.9.
Con Outdated Rendering Engine
Not much left in WebKit since Google left.
Con Steep learning curve
Being a terminal web browser w3m has a certain learning curve because you need to learn the keystrokes and different commands.