When comparing enduro.js vs Write.as, the Slant community recommends Write.as for most people. In the question“What are the best solutions for a personal blog?” Write.as is ranked 14th while enduro.js is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Write.as is:
Works totally anonymously or you can sign up with a pen name.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Minimalistic
No clutter and useless features.
Pro Beautiful admin panel
Clients are always amazed how smooth and good looking the admin interface is.
Pro Productive
Currently, probably the most productive CMS around. There is almost no setup, admin is auto generated, 100% development in code editing, shared backend/front end templates, and shared javascript code.
Pro Protects your privacy
Works totally anonymously or you can sign up with a pen name.
Pro No sign up required
You can publish without ever signing up or giving out your email address.
Pro Clean writing space
It's made for writing, so there aren't crazy buttons and alerts all over the place to distract you.
Cons
Con Hardly any github commits since fall '16
Con No support for databases
Con Community size
The community around the project looks quite small. Anyone to confirm my thought ?
Con Very simple
The editor only lets you write plain text, select from a few fonts, and use Markdown for formatting. It's difficult to use Write.as for more complicated blogging or creating a full website.
Con The writing space is very limited
The writing window is limited to only about one-fifth of the page, the rest is just blank. You can only see about three lines of text at a time. Seems like a mismanaging of space.