When comparing enduro.js vs Contentflow, the Slant community recommends enduro.js for most people. In the question“What is the best Node.js-based CMS?” enduro.js is ranked 6th while Contentflow is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose enduro.js is:
No clutter and useless features.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Minimalistic
No clutter and useless features.
Pro Beautiful admin panel
Clients are always amazed how smooth and good looking the admin interface is.
Pro Productive
Currently, probably the most productive CMS around. There is almost no setup, admin is auto generated, 100% development in code editing, shared backend/front end templates, and shared javascript code.
Pro Multistream
You can live stream across multiple platforms. You can distribute your stream(s) simultaneously to several Facebook accounts, Youtube Live, Twitch, and other social media platforms
Pro Subtitles
Subtitles can be created automatically and in an impressive quality.
Pro Video file
The video is available immediately after the livestream for download in different resolutions.
Pro Own player
A video player, which can be integrated into any website, is included. On request also with a chat.
Pro Cutting
It is possible to cut content from the running stream and export or publish it.
Pro Teamwork
Pro Graphics
Graphics, such as a logo, can be displayed
Cons
Con Hardly any github commits since fall '16
Con No support for databases
Con Community size
The community around the project looks quite small. Anyone to confirm my thought ?
Con It's expensive
1000 dollars per month.
Con Graphic
Unfortunately the graphics cannot be changed during the stream.