When comparing Amethyst vs Babylon.js, the Slant community recommends Babylon.js for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D game engines?” Babylon.js is ranked 8th while Amethyst is ranked 21st. The most important reason people chose Babylon.js is:
Thanks to the increasing popularity of Babylon, it has a growing community of helpful developers. It's easy to find help on their [forum](http://www.html5gamedevs.com/forum/16-babylonjs/).
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro It's free and open-source
Amethyst is published under the MIT license making it open-source and id offered completely free. This allows anyone to give the tiling window manger a try, which is great.
Pro Recently updated and rewritten in Swift.
The application was written in Objective-C, but was recently updated and completely rewritten in Apple's new native language Swift.
Pro True tiling means never losing track of windows under a huge pile of others
Pro Works with keyboard shortcuts, no mouse needed
As it's designed to work closely to how xmonad, Amethyst uses keyboard shortcuts to control the windows being used, meaning no mouse input is necessary. This can make for a faster way to control windows.
Pro Multi-monitor suppport
Pro Under active development
Pro Can switch between tiling and floating mode
Pro Has Many common layouts to choose from (fullscreen, floating, row, column, wide, etc)
Pro Small (but helpful) community
Thanks to the increasing popularity of Babylon, it has a growing community of helpful developers. It's easy to find help on their forum.
Pro A good amount of easy to understand resources to learn from
Babylon provides a playground where you can explore examples and play with the code.
The official documentation offers a wide variety of well-written tutorials on topics from beginner to advanced.
Additionally, there are many tutorials written by the community available that you can find by doing a google search.
Pro Great base shader material
Pro Actively developed
Babylon has great project health, with activity on Github daily for bug fixes and new features.
Con There are more user friendly window managers available
There are certainly more user friendly window managers available for MacOS, such as Divvy or Moom. Amethyst, however, is more powerful and customizable than the more user friendly options available and therefore may be a better choice for a user looking for more advanced capabilities and customization.
Con Young project
Babylon is quite young compared to many of it's competitors (released in 2013). The community is still somewhat small, however growing quickly.