RapydScript vs Amber
When comparing RapydScript vs Amber, the Slant community recommends Amber for most people. In the question“What are the best languages that compile to JavaScript? ” Amber is ranked 11th while RapydScript is ranked 45th. The most important reason people chose Amber is:
Amber includes an integrated development environment with a class browser, workspace, transcript, object inspector and debugger.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro It isn't just another Python-to-JS compiler, it is mix of the best of both languages
You write it like Python, but the output is clear JS-code as if it was written in pure JS.
If you like JQuery or other JS-libs - just use it without any adaptors: foo = $('#foo') or even $foo = $('#foo').
It makes understanding and using prototypes easier, and offers an alternative to @decorator.
Pro Includes an IDE
Amber includes an integrated development environment with a class browser, workspace, transcript, object inspector and debugger.
Pro Smalltalk is a simple, elegant, and powerful language
Pro One-to-one JS equivalent
Amber is written in itself, including the parser and compiler, and compiles into efficient JavaScript, mapping one-to-one with the JS equivalent.
Cons
Con Very few learning resources
There are very little learning resources for Amber outside the official documentation. Which may not be enough for beginners, especially people that don't have much experience in programming.