When comparing SEQUEL for PostgreSQL vs Beekeeper Studio, the Slant community recommends SEQUEL for PostgreSQL for most people. In the question“What are the best Mac OS X GUIs for PostgreSQL?” SEQUEL for PostgreSQL is ranked 7th while Beekeeper Studio is ranked 9th.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Very powerful and extended autocomplete.
Pro Customisable interface, feature rich SQL Editor with syntax highlight and autocomplete
Pro Thought-out object editors
There is no need to jump around tabs, etc. Everything is always available on the same page.
Pro Great GUI layout for small screens
Perfectly fits on a Macbook Pro 13's screen. Very comfortable to work with.
Pro Provides detailed control over every database element
Every database element has it's own management form, providing all available settings and parameters modification.
Pro Easy update table data from custom query
Easy to edit sql query result data and push back to database.
Pro Easy to use
Way less confusing than other DB managers, and has a simple tabbed interface that feels more like VS Code.
Pro Free and Open Source
MIT License!
Pro Postgres
I use SQLite, MySQL, and Postgres, and Beekeeper supports all of them!
Pro Autocomplete
The autocomplete is useful but not obtrusive
Cons
Con No Support documentation
Con No Passphrase for SSH keys
No ability to add a passphrase for an ssh key, refuses to connect to remote server without it.
Con No trial version
Con Closed source
Con Not for a DBA
It's great for web/app developers who interact with a database, but if you're a full time DBA you probably have better powertools available
