When comparing QSnipps vs Cacher - Snippet Manager for Pro Developers, the Slant community recommends Cacher - Snippet Manager for Pro Developers for most people. In the question“What is the best code-snippets manager?” Cacher - Snippet Manager for Pro Developers is ranked 15th while QSnipps is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose Cacher - Snippet Manager for Pro Developers is:
2-way syncing with GitHub Gist. Free tier includes this feature.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Not a bad UI
Pro Sync to GitHub gist
2-way syncing with GitHub Gist. Free tier includes this feature.
Pro Integration with Editors
It integrates with VSCode, Atom, IntelliJ, Sublime, and Slack.
Pro Good user interface
User Interface is clean and simple.
Pro Labels and language filters
Filter your snippets by custom labels and programming languages.
Pro Desktop apps for Mac, Windows and Linux
Cacher comes with clients for major platforms.
Pro Team libraries
Easily share snippets and collaborate with your team.
Pro Feature recommendations through Trello public board
Cachers public board to recommend features.
Pro Comments
You can write comments for the snippets.
Pro Attach files related to the snippets
You can add files which act as a reference for the snippets.
Pro Markdown support
Excellent markdown support for snippet description and comments.
Pro Code runner
You can run your snippets inside the cacher but it has to be in proper syntax.
If you have a snippet block, it won't work.
Pro Browser extensions
Web browser extensions are also available to capture snippets.
Pro Full text searching
The search functionality is awesome.
Cons
Con Seldom updated or improved
There are no frequent updates/improvements.
Con Tag support is squirrly
You can add tags, but there's no auto-complete when you're filling them in, so you can easily make sure you're adding to the same tag(s) that already exist.
Con ZERO Support
Any and all messages sent to the developer go straight to DEV>NULL.
Con NEVER updated anymore
Missing many newer languages. (I'd go as far as to say it's abandonware).
Con No Linux version
There is no Linux version of the software.
Con Very limited as free version
Very expensive for what it does for the monthly cost it is asking for.
Con Pricing is costly
Cacher costs $8 for a month and $6 for a month (for a yearly subscription). If they'd reduce the price to $5 or $4, it would be better.
Con Free version makes everything public
Con Labels, comments and private snippets will be lost once you ended up your subscription
Once you plan to leave Cacher, you can't carry the labels and comments that you have given for the snippet.