When comparing Plume WiFi vs TP-Link Talon AD7200, the Slant community recommends TP-Link Talon AD7200 for most people. In the question“What are the best wireless routers?” TP-Link Talon AD7200 is ranked 11th while Plume WiFi is ranked 16th. The most important reason people chose TP-Link Talon AD7200 is:
This router uses a 1.4GHz dual-core processor, which is more than enough to manage all the processing needs of this device. This ensures users will feel no network hiccups.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Compact design
Plume WiFi system consists of hexagonal pods. Compared to most routers, Plume pods are very tiny and one can easily fit in the palm of a hand. They're just 2.5 inches across and 1.5 inches deep.
Pro Self improving, adaptive network
Plume WiFi uses cloud-based technology to figure out how you’re using the internet. It checks for interference from other devices and what devices are connected to each pod. It uses this information and over time optimizes its network to achieve the best possible performance.
Pro Fits in with a variety of decors
Pods are available in three colors - champagne, silver, and onyx. This gives you the option to match routers with your interior.
Pro Smooth performance with powerful CPU
This router uses a 1.4GHz dual-core processor, which is more than enough to manage all the processing needs of this device. This ensures users will feel no network hiccups.
Pro Extremely fast speeds
The AD7200 is a tri-band router, with a maximum theoretical speed of up to 7.2 Gbps over its three bands. In real life testing, The Talon manages an average download speed of 867.6Mbps. That throughput is possible mainly because of the router’s use of the new 802.11ad Wi-Fi standard.
Pro Easy to setup
Configuring this router is very simple: just plug it to a power outlet and then just access it via ethernet or its default wireless network.
Pro Intuitive mobile interface via its Tether app
Tether is an app for this router. It has a easy to use layout that allows you to setup the router and access WiFi settings such as guest access and parental controls.
Cons
Con Poor range
With six pods, the system can cover a home of 1,800 square feet. Range of a single pod, with clear line of sight, is about 20 to 30 feet. If there are any obstacles, range decreases to about 15 feet. Beyond 15 feet you might lose connectivity.
You’ll need a separate pod for every room and for each pod you'll need a separate outlet. If you have a bigger living room, you might even need two pods.
Con Lacking performance
Plume WiFi is capable of a theoretical combined throughput of 1.2 Gbps. Realistically at a close range of 5 feet and a clear line of sight, the router registers throughput of 230 Mbps. When the distance is increased and there is no clear line of sight, throughput drops to 60 Mbps.
Con Lacks additional features
The Plume Pods lack additional features that are common in other WiFi systems, such as manual bandwidth prioritisation, manually assigning a device to a pod, or measuring the bandwidth usage of Ethernet devices.
Con Few/any currently available wireless ad adapters
Con Expensive
Even if the Talon AD7200 is a good product, unless you have 802.11ad clients, it's not worth the price it costs.
Con Poor range
The range of new 802.11ad WiFi standard is 10 times lower when compared to the more commonly used 802.11ac. And it can't penetrate walls, making its use very limited for most households.