When comparing cplusplus vs twinBASIC, the Slant community recommends twinBASIC for most people. In the question“What are the best compiled programming languages?” twinBASIC is ranked 12th while cplusplus is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose twinBASIC is:
Any code that runs in VB6 will run in twinBASIC (once v1 is released). Code that runs in VBA will also run in twinBASIC, though you need to account for any dependencies on the host application's object model (e.g., the Excel or Access Application object).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro References
Details view of certain functionalities in C++
Pro Forum
Discussions for various topics regarding C++ including OS based sub-forums.
Pro Articles
User C++ articles ranging from small examples to more complex ones. Good to better understand the capabilities of the language.
Pro Tutorials
Tutorials for beginners. A good way to learn.
Pro 100% Backward Compatible with VB6/VBA
Any code that runs in VB6 will run in twinBASIC (once v1 is released). Code that runs in VBA will also run in twinBASIC, though you need to account for any dependencies on the host application's object model (e.g., the Excel or Access Application object).
Pro No runtime requirement
The lack of a runtime dependency makes twinBASIC applications very lightweight and portable. Additionally, compiled executables only include necessary code from any referenced libraries. The classic "Hello, World" program compiles down to an 8 KB .exe with no external dependencies.
Pro Compile DLLs to extend VBA functionality
Can be used to extend VBA functionality by compiling standard and ActiveX DLLs in both 32 and 64bit.
Pro 64bit compilation is supported
64bit compilation is supported, as well as 32bit.
Pro At last! a replacement for VB6
At last there is a replacement for Microsoft VB6 - and for VBA too - twinBASIC programming.
Cons
Con Search doesn't always works as expected
Sometimes searching for terms related with C++ features returns a lot of articles and forum discussions when you wanted a Reference.
Con Old fashioned website
Not responsive and not very pretty. Not mobile ready. Letters small for nowadays displays.