Here’s the Deal

Gitit vs Confluence

13 3

31 20

When comparing Gitit vs Confluence, the Slant community recommends Confluence for most people. In the question“What are the best multi-user wikis?” Confluence is ranked 3rd while Gitit is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose Confluence is:

Confluence offers a highly intuitive and user friendly experience without sacrificing the advanced feature set of a typical wiki.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best multi-user wikis?

Pros

Pro
Lots of export formats

Giti has a multitude of formats that it allows to be exported, including LaTeX, ConTeXt, DocBook, RTF, OpenOffice ODT, and MediaWiki markup.

Pro
Supports markdown

Getit supports markdown, a plain text formatting syntax that is designed so that it can be read by HTML.

Pro
Free and open source software (FOSS)

Licensed under GPLv2 so you can download source code and customize to meet your needs, provided that you know or are willing to learn Haskell.

Pro
Can be used collaboratively by multiple people

Pro
Renders math

Using MathJax.

Pro
Easy to use

Confluence offers a highly intuitive and user friendly experience without sacrificing the advanced feature set of a typical wiki.

Pro
Integrates well with other services

Confluence integrates well with other Atlassian offerings like Jira, a bug tracking system.

Pro
Keyboard shortcuts support

There are a lot of shortcuts to speed up the interactions with the editor, viewscreen, workbox, etc.

Pro
Hierarchical page tree

Most wikis don't have a page hierarchy, but Confluence has one, and this is very helpful for a lot of people.

Pro
Great plugin ecosystem

Confluence offers a huge selection of paid and free plugins across all kinds of different categories that extend the functionality of the core software.

Pro
Document and inline commenting offers low-commitment opportunities to contribute

Often someone that is not an expert/owner of a process is hesitant to edit documentation of someone that is. The ability to merely comment on the existing material helps elicit improvements without requiring as much boldness.

Pro
LDAP integration

Confluence provides built-in connectors for:

Microsoft Active Directory
Apache Directory Server (ApacheDS)
Apple Open Directory
Fedora Directory Server
Novell eDirectory
OpenDS
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP Using Posix Schema
Posix Schema for LDAP
Sun Directory Server Enterprise Edition (DSEE)
A generic LDAP directory server

Ad
Cons

Con
Requires Haskell

On some Linux platforms a binary package for Haskell may not be included in the standard repositories. So, it will be necessary to compile Haskell from source code or find a non-standard package repository, which may seem like a hassle if you don't use Haskell for anything else.

Con
Pretty slow

The hosted version feels slow and can be annoying to use regularly.

Con
Search is utterly terrible

It requires having to put in almost exactly what's needed to get a result on the front page. Defeats the purpose of the problem it's supposedly solving.

Con
Many unresolved bugs

Atlassian is notorious for not resolving bugs for months or even years in Confluence.

Con
Costs money

Although inexpensive, starting at $10/mo for 10 users, many other solutions are free.

Con
WSIWYG editor is broken

Markup is not saved and complicated to use.
Not suitable for dev teams.

Con
Redesigns are rolled out without thorough testing

There were two major redesigns for Confluence (cloud version) in the last couple of years, and both of them were released in a very immature state, causing a lot of trouble for existing clients.